The court in the Mark Hunt-UFC/Dana White/Brock Lesnar lawsuit has granted Hunt the opportunity to Supplement his lawsuit to include facts about his removal from UFC Fight Night 121.
Order on Supplemental Complaint by JASONCRUZ206 on Scribd
In finding for Hunt, the court stated that Defendants’ argument in precluding the filing a supplemental complaint was that the allegations were false. Secondly, they argue that the accusations are distinctly different from the lawsuit. The Court denied both arguments.
Payout Perspective:
As we stated, this was the likely result as the Court would be willing to include the additional information in order to properly litigate the entire case rather than piecemeal. The factual claims serve as to bolster Hunt’s causes of action. It also forces Defendants to address the allegations as it tries to dismiss the lawsuit.
Leave a Reply