• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Parties agreed to extend time for UFC, White to answer Mark Hunt lawsuit

February 6, 2017 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

We will have to wait until the end of the month to see the response the UFC and Dana White will provide to Mark Hunt’s lawsuit.  The parties agreed to extend the time for the UFC and White to respond according to a legal filing on Friday.

According to the stipulation, the UFC and White will provide a joint response to the lawsuit filed by Hunt last month.  The UFC Heavyweight sued the company, White and Brock Lesnar as it relates to his fight at UFC 200 this past July.  Among the claims, filed in federal court in Nevada, breach of contract, RICO violations and negligence.

The stipulation is below.  The UFC and White has until February 28, 2017 to provide a response.

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by JASONCRUZ206 on Scribd

The stipulation notes that White had yet to be personally served (a requisite in lawsuits), but will accept service based on his attorneys receiving the lawsuit.  It also notes that the UFC and White will share one response.  This means that Lesnar will need his own attorneys and has yet to respond.

Payout Perspective:

The stipulation only applies to the UFC and White which means that Lesnar has until tomorrow to respond if he was personally served the lawsuit.  Lesnar could seek an extension to respond as well.  Note, the term “respond” as the UFC and White may file a Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit.  The rules state that they can do this prior to filing an Answer.  You can expect this to happen and the extension of time may provide them more time to do this.  In the alternative, the extra time may mean they want to either negotiate with Hunt and/or file a response with counterclaims.

Filed Under: Hunt v. Zuffa, legal, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Plaintiffs seeking $270K from Dominance MMA

UFC Seattle attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Houston going down 2-0 to #Lakers, I think #NBA is rigged

Yet Cowboys got its old-ass owner having his own press conferences after every game

Football Crave @FootballCravee

The Colts had internal discussions regarding Owner Carlie Irsay-Gordon’s sideline presence and if it was becoming a distraction.

“It wasn’t a problem until she started asking questions in the middle of the ——ing game.”

Irsay-Gordon has agreed to stay in the press box.

Did the parents not think he was an NFL quarterback?

MLFootball @MLFootball

TRENDING: #Bills QB Josh Allen is under CRITICISM from fans for being “CLASSLESS” by firing up the crowd before the #Sabres playoff game & chugging a beer.

Multiple parents have posted that this is not the type of behavior that should be shown to kids 😳

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Pickensburgh last night

Kash should drink himself into Valhalla so he won’t have to answer the questions.

The Halfway Post @HalfwayPost

BREAKING: Staff members at the various nightclubs Kash Patel parties at are reportedly willing to testify against him in his lawsuit against The Atlantic because he doesn't tip well, he creeps out the bottle service girls, and he "wrecks all the toilets."

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports