• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Prior to his return from ban, Sullivan flagged for potential USADA violation

January 27, 2017 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

UFC lightweight George Sullivan became the first fighter to potentially become a two-time offender of the UFC Anti-Doping Policy.  He was flagged for a potential banned substance from an out-of-competition test on January 14, 2017.

At the time, Sullivan was serving a one-year ban due to declaring he took a prohibited substance prior to his fight at UFC on Fox 20 in July, 2016.  He was given a provisional suspension. He professed his innocence in a Facebook post.  Prior to his test of January 14th, he had never tested positive for a banned substance.

In another Facebook post, he stated that he was taking a male fertility drug and that was the reason for the flagged test.  Sullivan claims that he is having his doctor provide the necessary information to USADA.

A portion of the UFC’s statement regarding Sullivan reads:

Sullivan is currently serving a one year suspension under the UFC Anti-Doping Program, for his use of a product containing the prohibited substance Insulin Growth Factor -1 (IGF-1).  Sullivan was due to end his current suspension on January 31, 2017, and compete on the UFC 208 card in Brooklyn, New York, against Randy Brown.  However, USADA has provisionally suspended Sullivan based on the new potential anti-doping violation, and the UFC has removed Sullivan from the UFC 208 card.  The UFC is currently seeking a replacement to face Randy Brown.

Payout Perspective:

Bad timing for Sullivan since he was due to get off of his one year ban and was scheduled to fight.  This would be the second time that he’s prepared for a fight and then been pulled.  Dependent on the prohibited substance, Sullivan’s transparency could mitigate some time from any suspension he may serve from this new finding.  Regardless of what substance it may be, I don’t foresee USADA allowing this test to pass without another suspension.  The question is whether this second suspension would carry a longer time away from the octagon.

Filed Under: Drug Testing, UFC, USADA

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

TKO owns this weekend

Appeals Court sets date for oral argument in Zuffa appeal

Don King sends Zuffa Boxing cease and desist

Zuffa files Reply Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Lawsuit

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

RT @janeymurcia: I want to clarify this because there seems to be some confusion, and it genuinely makes me sad to think Ryan is under the…

UFC Noche attendance, gate and bonuses https://mmapayout.com/2026/09/12/ufc-noche-attendance-gate-and-bonuses/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

#NocheUFC Glendale

Announced Gate: $4,436,470 (Highest-grossing domestic fight night gate in UFC history)
Announced Attendance: 16,928

2026 Non-Meta Apex Fight Nights:

UFC Paris:
Announced Gate: $4,365,335 (Highest grossing event in Accor Arena History)
Announced Attendance:

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

To the great people of @FoxSportsRadio, I am not crushing you or your hosts. I'm just saying nobody cares about @Stugotz since he left @LeBatardShow. And I'm right...I'm just saying nobody cares about him. That's all. I mean, come get me, Stugotz. Seriously. I'm not afraid of you

Sark has been an increasing ass since going to Texas

Brian Nemhauser @hawkblogger

This belongs on the wall of awkward postgame interviews

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports