• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Borris talks PFA purpose on The MMA Hour

August 15, 2016 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

Professional Fighters Association’s (PFA) Jeff Borris was a guest on The MMA Hour to discuss the newly formed PFA which seeks to unionize UFC fighters.  Borris spoke at length about his reasons for his involvement and how his organization differs from MMAFA.

Borris was amazed when he first saw the bout and promotional agreement for Diaz-McGregor I as he saw things that were not valid, unenforceable and needed to be changed.  Lloyd Pierson, a co-worker of Borris and the agent for Diaz, had asked Borris for input on the agreements.

With the seeming tension between MMAFA, Borris indicated that he did not oppose their purpose but believed that it was different from what PFA intendes to do for UFC fighters.

Among its action items once PFA has a bulk of the over 600 UFC contracted fighters on its side were health insurance, pension benefits, a grievance policy and a bargained-for drug policy.

Borris noted the concern existing UFC fighters have had with respect to organizing for fear of retaliation.  He indicated that he will be in Vegas and hold a press conference this week as UFC 202 happens on Saturday night.

Payout Perspective:

Borris is a part of the Ballengee Group.  The agency represents the Diaz Brothers which is a point of concern from some as there would appear to be a conflict of interest with organizing a union while representing fighters.  Borris indicated that it would be the fighters that would be in charge of the union.  He indicated that the UFC had not contacted him since the announcement of the PFA.  We will see how/if the UFC addresses this new organization seeking to unite UFC fighters.

Filed Under: UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. dave lebold says

    August 16, 2016 at 10:25 pm

    Do you think the most interesting part of the interview was Jeff Borris’s insistence that UFC fighters were legally employees and that their independent contractor status was just to benefit the UFC.

    It seemed that this was not even something he had any concerns about.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to dave lebold Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports