• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

15 for 15: No. 9 Nick Diaz vs. NSAC

December 25, 2015 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Nick Diaz returned to the octagon in February 2015 to face Anderson Silva at UFC 183.  No one would have thought that each fighter would test positive for banned substances let alone the penalty issued Diaz.

Not surprising, but Diaz tested positive for marijuana.  Although Diaz’s lawyers pointed out inconsistencies with the testing, the commission determined that Diaz violated the commission rules.  What was surprising, the penalty issue by the commission: 5 years, $165,000 fine.  Perhaps the reason for the upheaval with the ruling was the proceedings that transpired.  Diaz, represented by lawyers, pleaded the Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself when asked questions by the commission.  Despite having lawyers on the commission, it was clear that Diaz’s lack of response irked the commission.

While the commission hearing is not considered an adversarial proceeding or a court hearing, the refusal to respond to the commission questions was likely a reason for the stiff sentence.  Moreover, the fact that the commission has yet to issue a written ruling has precluded Diaz from seeking a judicial review in court.  There has been news that UFC’s lawyers at Campbell and Williams have been negotiating a settlement with the commission to avoid further litigation.  However, that has yet come to fruition.

Its clear UFC Fight Pass played a role in the grassroots effort to reinstate Diaz.  The fact that people could watch for themselves as the hearing went on, viewers had a chance to judge for themselves what was going on instead of reading reports from the hearing.

The penalty issued Diaz set off widespread support for the fighter.  Ronda Rousey spoke publicly about the perceived unfair decision.  Henry Cejudo  and Leslie Smith vowed not to fight in the state of Nevada due to the ruling.  A White House petition was started to overturn the commission decision.  The petition drew over 108,000 signatures.  It needed 100,000 to receive a response from the White House.  Of course, the response from the White House was nothing earth-shattering as it deferred to the state of Nevada.

Filed Under: Drug Testing, Featured, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Jon jones vs Alex pereira
Connor vs Diaz 3
Illa vs Justin
Sean o vs Peter yan

I would’ve ran the White House card something like that 🤷‍♂️

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

New paramount fans are super happy :/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Mexico manager Benji Gil calls Monday’s game against USA not only a baseball game, but one of the greatest spectacles in sports with this WBC rivalry. The game is sold out with only standing room only tickets available.

SEATTLESUBMISSIONS @SEATTLESUBMISS

Today is Seattle’s first 7pm sunset of 2026. The dark days are officially over.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 🌇

“What’s the benefit of being tall if you are going to be beat up by a midget anyways”

Happy Punch @HappyPunch

Sean O’Malley went on Matan Even’s show and got cooked 😭

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports