• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

WWE hit with another head injury lawsuit

April 10, 2015 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Another head injury lawsuit has been filed against the WWE by former wrestlers claiming that the company did not disclose information regarding traumatic brain injuries as well as its “egregious mistreatment of its wrestlers.”  The lawsuit was filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  It is the fourth lawsuit within a year filed by former WWE wrestlers.

Previously, William Albert Haynes II ( Billy Jack Haynes) filed a lawsuit in Oregon, Vito LoGrasso and Evan Singleton filed a lawsuit in Philadelphia and the widow of Nelson Lee Frazier filed a lawsuit in Tennessee.

The lawsuit filed Thursday involves Russ McCullough, Ryan Sakoda and Matthew R. Wiese.  All three wrestlers reside in Southern California according to the Class Action Complaint.

There are seven causes of action in the Complaint including Fraudulent Concealment and Failure to Disclose or Warn and Negligence.  The lawsuit also includes a claim of the violation of the California Unfair Competition Law.  Essentially it’s a state action related to the WWE’s alleged misrepresentation/concealment of information related to “head impacts and related injuries” which were associated with performing at WWE events.

This lawsuit was filed by San Francisco-based Class Action law firm of Audet & Partners.  It requests that the lawsuit be considered for class action status.

A copy of the lawsuit is here via @indeedwrestling.

Payout Perspective:

MMA Payout will keep you posted as the class action lawsuits against the WWE mount.  Although we have yet to read the full 47 page Complaint, it appears to mirror the other lawsuits (specifically the Haynes lawsuit including pics embedded in the pleading) filed with respect to the WWE’s alleged failure to warn and/or disclose information about head injuries to its contracted performers.  It appears that this pattern of class action lawsuits may be similar to what the NFL and NHL have seen in recent years.

Filed Under: legal, pro wrestling, WWE

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Lawsuit seeks to shutdown UFC White House event

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

From the Judge's Order today denying the injunction. The Court states that plaintiffs did not have a specific harm to satisfy the threshold for an injunction #UFCWhiteHouse #TKO #UFC

Judge Amit Mehta, the judge that denied the #UFC White House injunction, was a Obama appointee. Just another reason to Blame Obama

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Only 16% of Americans approve of Trump holding UFC event at White House.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ALERT: Judge Amit Metha rules UFC event can proceed at White House, ruling harm to plaintiffs would only be "temporary" & that the challenge came too late

"Considerable time, labor & funding.. has gone into organizing the UFC fight and lead-up events"

Full contact 5 days a week 😂

MMA Mania @mmamania

Mania Mailbag: Do we trane UFC? https://www.mmamania.com/mma-mailbag-questions-answers-ufc/449583/mania-mailbag-do-we-trane-ufc?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports