• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Wanderlei Silva sues NSAC seeking reversal of lifetime ban, fine

January 20, 2015 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

MMA Fighting reports that Wanderlei Silva has filed a lawsuit against the Nevada State Athletic Commission.  Silva claims that the commission overstepped its boundaries in issuing him a lifetime ban last year.

In addition to the ban, the NSAC issued a $70,000 fine this past September.  The punishment arose out of his failure to take a drug test in lead-up to a fight with Chael Sonnen this past July.  As we know, the fight never happened.

“This case encapsulates agency aggrandizement at its worst where disciplinary ation was taken against a non-licensed person,” reads the introduction of Silva’s Complaint filed by Ross Goodman in Clark County, Nevada’ District Court.

Silva’s attorney argues that the NSAC did not have jurisdiction over Silva since he was not licensed in the state of Nevada at the time officials attempted to drug test Silva.  Silva’s attorney claims that the statutes which the NSAC must follow only pertain to a “licensee.”

Silva is looking for the NSAC ruling to be reversed and set aside which could the clear pathway for Silva to fight in Nevada again.

Goodman is familiar with combatting the NSAC.  In April 2012, he sued the NSAC on behalf of Nick Diaz.

W. Silva v. Bennett and NSAC

Court filing via MMA Fighting.

Payout Perspective:

As we indicated in December, the process for appeal of an administrative ruling is usually through filing a lawsuit seeking a “petition for review.” Still, we wonder why Silva is going through this legal process when he could work around the suspension in Nevada and still fight. Silva’s attorney makes an interesting legal argument based on the Nevada statutes which the commission must follow. We will see how the judicial system handles interpretation of these statutes and this case.

Filed Under: Featured, legal, NSAC, regulation, review, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Mayweather-CSI Entertainment legal drama heats up

Mayweather legal saga continues as CSI Entertainment continues to pursue injunction

Mayweather boxing exhibition in Greece cancelled

Mayweather responds to CSI Entertainment Injunction request

Injunction filed against Mayweather from fighting this Saturday

The UFC’s undying loyalty to Trump

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Mayweather-CSI Entertainment legal drama heats up #boxing #sportslaw https://mmapayout.com/2026/07/01/mayweather-csi-entertainment-legal-drama-heats-up/

There are no rules…

Paul Gift @MMAanalytics

You can write to a judge about someone committing perjury? I didn’t know you could do that. Would’ve been good to know.

My wife says the same to me every day 😜

Megan @Megan_O_32

FUCK YOU JASON

I hope every time you cough or sneeze you pee yourself.

They should have a statute of his agent somewhere

Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter

Happy Bobby Bonilla Deferral Day: Bonilla is set to collect another $1.193 million from the New York Mets today, as he will each July 1st through the year 2035.

#Mayweather attorneys respond with 2 letters

4

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

Here we go, Judd Burstein accuses Floyd #Mayweather of perjury. The CSI Entertainment-Mayweather lawsuit going to heat up. Any thought the parties were going to work together amicably was barking up the wrong tree. #boxing #SportsLaw

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports