• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Wanderlei Silva sues NSAC seeking reversal of lifetime ban, fine

January 20, 2015 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

MMA Fighting reports that Wanderlei Silva has filed a lawsuit against the Nevada State Athletic Commission.  Silva claims that the commission overstepped its boundaries in issuing him a lifetime ban last year.

In addition to the ban, the NSAC issued a $70,000 fine this past September.  The punishment arose out of his failure to take a drug test in lead-up to a fight with Chael Sonnen this past July.  As we know, the fight never happened.

“This case encapsulates agency aggrandizement at its worst where disciplinary ation was taken against a non-licensed person,” reads the introduction of Silva’s Complaint filed by Ross Goodman in Clark County, Nevada’ District Court.

Silva’s attorney argues that the NSAC did not have jurisdiction over Silva since he was not licensed in the state of Nevada at the time officials attempted to drug test Silva.  Silva’s attorney claims that the statutes which the NSAC must follow only pertain to a “licensee.”

Silva is looking for the NSAC ruling to be reversed and set aside which could the clear pathway for Silva to fight in Nevada again.

Goodman is familiar with combatting the NSAC.  In April 2012, he sued the NSAC on behalf of Nick Diaz.

W. Silva v. Bennett and NSAC

Court filing via MMA Fighting.

Payout Perspective:

As we indicated in December, the process for appeal of an administrative ruling is usually through filing a lawsuit seeking a “petition for review.” Still, we wonder why Silva is going through this legal process when he could work around the suspension in Nevada and still fight. Silva’s attorney makes an interesting legal argument based on the Nevada statutes which the commission must follow. We will see how the judicial system handles interpretation of these statutes and this case.

Filed Under: Featured, legal, NSAC, regulation, review, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Does Conor McGregor still have the aura?

Court Memo and Order from CSI Entertainment-Mayweather TRO hearing

TKO responds to allegations of missing discovery in Johnson case

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Glorified mascot 😂😂😂
Who is bruh
Who gave him a voice
You play 3 years gang
3 different teams

Ain’t coming at you but stop trying me bruh
@EmmanuelAcho

What

Jon Rothstein @NotJ0NRoth

Breaking: ESPN parting ways with long time college basketball personality Jay Bilas.

ICYMI

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

CSI Entertainment attorneys claim that Stephen Espinoza's declaration in support of Floyd #Mayweather is a #quidproquo as the boxer is suing Espinoza and #Showtime #Boxing

WA judge halts Kalshi 'prediction market' via @seattletimes

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The us number for the McGregor show was 6.1. Milllion. White House show was 7 million. Rousey fight was just over 9. But Netflix has a big advantage in homes.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports