• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Survey compares UFC and Boxing fans

May 6, 2014 by Jason Cruz 6 Comments

The Sports Business Journal reports on the Scarborough annual survey which tracks the habits of avid fans of the UFC and pro boxing.  The Scarborough survey of over 200,000 U.S. residents age 18 and older indicates that 12.1% of the U.S. general population says they are very or somewhat interested in pro boxing, while 10.8% state the same about the UFC.

The results are similar to that of last year with the exception that the survey no longer compares pro wrestling with the two other combat sports.

According to the survey, most respondents from the UFC were in the Men 18-34 demographic (24.0%) while boxing had the same demo but a little less in the 18-34 range (19.3%).  The survey shows more Men over 50 interested in boxing (15.5%) than the UFC (8.8%).  As for women, the younger generation dominates again with both sports having the most women interested in the sport in the 18-34 range (UFC: 11.1%; boxing 10.4%).

Household Incomes

The household incomes for UFC fans in this survey vary greatly from the “Less than $35K” (11.5%) to the “$250K +” demo (9.3%).  Boxing fans are the same with more fans in the “Less than $35K” (13.8%) and “$250K +” demo (10.5%).

Most of the fans in the survey earn less than $50K which may be based on more respondents being in the younger demos as many young people are just starting in their careers and earn less.

Ethnicity

The categories listed for ethnicity included White, Black/African American, Asian, Other and Spanish/Hispanic origin.

For the UFC, “Other” was the most represented with 16.0% of the people surveyed.

For boxing, Spanish/Hispanic origin had the most represented with 23.7% of the people surveyed.

Markets

Top 3 Markets for the UFC

1)      Honolulu, Hawaii

2)      El Paso, Texas

3)      Albuquerque/Santa Fe, NM

Top 3 Markets for Boxing

1)      Harlingen/Weslaco/Brownsville/McAllen, Texas

2)      El Paso, Texas

3)      San Antonio, Texas

Payout Perspective:

Similar to last year, the survey reveals much of what we already knew.  The UFC fan base caters to the younger generation while boxing is received much better by the older generation.  As for the key markets, Honolulu is first again for the UFC.  This may be based on the interest with BJ Penn.  For boxing, the key markets are all in Texas. This would fall in line with the heavy interest from the Hispanic population.  The takeaway from all of this is that despite the fact that some loathe to compare the UFC and boxing, the survey shows that the two sports vie for the same demos.

Filed Under: boxing, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Diego says

    May 7, 2014 at 4:48 am

    Did they look at how many responders are fans of both? My issue with these surveys is that they oversimplify the “competition” between MMA and boxing. It’s likely that a lot of people are fans of both sports, and hence competition isn’t just between boxing and MMA, but between individual fight cards within and across the two sports.

    For example, I will watch the Velazquez – Werdum fight, but I didn’t watch the Mayweather fight. That’s not because I’m a bigger fan of MMA than boxing, but because I’m a bigger fan of Velazquez and Werdum than of Mayweather and I feel that the UFC card will be more competitive overall (though the Mayweather fight did turn out to be competitive, the undercard was crap). I will however buy the Canelo-Lara fight, because it will be competitive and I like both fighters.

    Likewise, I didn’t buy the Jones-Teixera card because I’m not a fan of Jones and didn’t think the fight would be competitive, but I will buy the Jones-Gustafsson rematch.

    Reply
  2. Bozo Dana says

    May 7, 2014 at 3:33 pm

    The suits like boxing and hate MMA it seems.

    Reply
  3. assassin says

    May 7, 2014 at 7:00 pm

    Diego makes some great points. Boxing has become not only event driven but individual main event driven. You might buy 3 PPV in a row, and then none for 6 months depending on who is fighting.

    The UFC I think was more card driven (how stacked was the card either in importance or star power of certain fighters) but now is more aligning to boxing. I like JJ, but had no interest in watching him cruise to an easy victory, but yes I am likely to buy the Gustafson fight. Bought Rousey-Tate II but not Rousey-McMann. Plus, there are just so freakin many fights that it becomes a time issue and not just a money issue.

    Reply
  4. Liken says

    May 8, 2014 at 12:01 pm

    @Diego

    Please stop pretending you have any interest in boxing. The Mayweather-Maidana undercard was one of the best cards ever. They had Adrien Broner vs Molina and Amir Khan vs Collazo on the same card. You clearly have no interest in boxing if you think those are bad fights.

    Reply
  5. Liken says

    May 8, 2014 at 12:13 pm

    About the article,

    I wish you people would stop pushing the idea that the UFC caters to younger fans while boxing caters to older ones. This article blatantly shows us that their number of young fans are practically identical.

    For boxing:
    12% of 314 million(US population) = 37 million total boxing fans
    If 19.3% are 18-34 then that means 7.1 million boxing fans are 18-35

    UFC:
    10.8% of 314 million = 31 million
    24% of them are 18-34 meaning there are 7.4 million UFC fans in that age range

    7.1 for boxing
    7.4 for the UFC

    And for this slight gap you people try act like the UFC has legions more younger fans? They’re almost identical.

    Reply
  6. Sampson The One and Only says

    May 8, 2014 at 3:43 pm

    The undercard was crap? Ahahahahahaha

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Bozo Dana Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Ortiz files motion to confirm injunction over

Congressional Report on Ali Revival Act released

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Someone needs to be fired from WSJ

Sohrab Ahmari @SohrabAhmari

Embarrassing.

Time to buy that Prius

Time to write your congress person

John S. Nash @heynottheface

HR 4624 (Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026) is scheduled for consideration for a vote in the House next week, under suspension of the rules (limit of 40 minutes for debate, no amendments are allowed, and needs a 2/3 vote to pass.)

No matter what that UFC White House is going to happen

Barak Ravid @BarakRavid

🚨🚨🚨Trump on Truth Social: Israel, out of anger for what has taken place in the Middle East, has violently lashed out at a major facility known as South Pars Gas Field in Iran. A relatively small section of the whole has been hit. The United States knew nothing about this

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Contrary to Trump’s statements, senior Israeli and U.S. officials said that the United States had prior knowledge of the Israeli strike and even approved it in an attempt to pressure Iran. After the Iranians retaliated against Qatar’s gas fields, Trump is now changing course

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports