• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Top 10 of 12: No. 5 GSP returns

December 29, 2012 by Jason Cruz 3 Comments

MMA Payout’s No. 5 story of 2012 is the return of Georges St. Pierre.  After an 18 month absence, GSP returned to the UFC and defeated Carlos Condit to unify the UFC welterweight title.

After receiving news of the PPV buys, Dana White indicated at the UFC on Fox 5 press conference that GSP “delivered” and that “the king of PPV” was back.

GSP broke a string of sub-500K buy PPVs in 2012.  The much-anticipated Silva-Sonnen II was the only card that had more PPV buys (925K) this year.

Below is a list of GSP PPVs since 2010.

UFC 111 vs. Dan Hardy – 770K PPV Buys
UFC 124 vs. Josh Koscheck – 800K
UFC 129 vs. Jake Shields – 800K
UFC 154 vs. Condit – 680K

GSP draws consistent buys averaging over 750K buys.  With him on the shelf for 18 months, it left the UFC without a known main eventer guaranteed to hit 750,000 PPV buys at least twice a year.

Despite a lower gate and attendance for UFC 154 than 124 (UFC 124 was in the same venue in Montreal) the PPV buys were in line with his usual buy rate.  In 2013, GSP’s average is likely to increase considering a spring date to defend his title against Nick Diaz and the possibility of Anderson Silva later in the year.

Its also worth noting that GSP’s brand has been very successful despite the injury layoff.  With the assistance of his marketing agents, he’s secured blue chip sponsors including Google, Coca Cola and Bacardi.

Filed Under: Featured, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. codemaster says

    December 31, 2012 at 11:00 am

    It should be pointed out that the UFC knows GSP is a big draw, and they usually do not stack any card he is on. The exceptions are UFC 100 and UFC 129.

    What this means is that GSP’s PPV numbers are almost totally reliant upon the main event. I think GSP’s numbers also suffer a bit because few contenders are considered credible threats to the champ.

    GSP has proven that a clean-cut mainstream image when coupled with success is money in the bank. Of course having CAA to manage his brand doesn’t hurt–but CAA probably wouldn’t have touched GSP without the prerequisite saleable image.

    I believe the business of MMA ‘breathes’. It has just had a ten-year or so sprint, making ever-increasing numbers each year–but in 2012, there was a drop in PPV and gate revenues–and the UFC and MMA is catching its breath. A bad economy is probably the greatest contributing factor when matched with high ticket prices for UFC events.

    As I have mentioned previously, the brand of the UFC is important, but even more important are the UFC stars–those who can carry a main event, and attract harcore and casual fans to the events. GSP remains a stalwart regarding PPV revenues–and though Meltzer’s estimates for UFC 154 appear lower than previous PPV’s–given all the factors of bad economy, relatively unknown opponent (to casual fans) in Carlos Condit, a fairly weak card besides the main event–GSP and his brand did pretty damn well.

    The business of ‘star-making’ in the UFC is fraught with peril. The promotion could invest large dollars building a budding star–only to have him lose 3 in a row and nullify all the promotional dollars spent. However, this business of star-making is crucial to the future success of the UFC–especially while it still relies upon the PPV model.

    Reply
  2. codemaster says

    December 31, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    I left out one fairly major point regarding GSP.

    GSP makes the UFC look good. Because of his mainstream appeal, and classy demeanor and behavior–he reinforces and adds lustre to the UFC brand itself. His personal integrity, honesty, and likeability help the UFC and Fox bring in sponsors (and fans) who might have reservations about the sport.

    Reply
  3. codemaster says

    January 27, 2013 at 1:21 pm

    One more point.

    I think the UFC should put GSP vs. Hendricks on a Fox broadcast.

    This would have marketing benefits which out-weigh the value of it if it were PPV.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Ortiz files motion to confirm injunction over

Congressional Report on Ali Revival Act released

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Someone needs to be fired from WSJ

Sohrab Ahmari @SohrabAhmari

Embarrassing.

Time to buy that Prius

Time to write your congress person

John S. Nash @heynottheface

HR 4624 (Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026) is scheduled for consideration for a vote in the House next week, under suspension of the rules (limit of 40 minutes for debate, no amendments are allowed, and needs a 2/3 vote to pass.)

No matter what that UFC White House is going to happen

Barak Ravid @BarakRavid

🚨🚨🚨Trump on Truth Social: Israel, out of anger for what has taken place in the Middle East, has violently lashed out at a major facility known as South Pars Gas Field in Iran. A relatively small section of the whole has been hit. The United States knew nothing about this

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Contrary to Trump’s statements, senior Israeli and U.S. officials said that the United States had prior knowledge of the Israeli strike and even approved it in an attempt to pressure Iran. After the Iranians retaliated against Qatar’s gas fields, Trump is now changing course

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports