• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Judge dismisses two counts in Zuffa’s lawsuit in New York

August 17, 2012 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

The Honorable Kimba Wood of the New York District Court for the Southern District ruled in favor of the state of New York (District Attorney and A.G.) and dismissed two of Zuffa’s counts in its lawsuit against the state.   Zuffa still has 5 counts remaining

In a 16 page opinion issued today, Judge Wood ruled in favor of the defendants as it dismissed the two counts of Equal Protection and Due Process violations.  Some background on the legal case is here and here.

Order on Zuffa’s Motion to Dismiss

In its decision the Court held that the 1997 law passed by New York had a rational basis at the time and now.  Despite the evolution of MMA it would not evaluate the law based on changed circumstances.  Even if it did, the Court stated that the MMA law was still rationally related to its intended purpose.

The Court had some interesting footnotes in its Opinion.  Notably in footnote 7 of the Opinion, the Court, for purposes of the Opinion, took as fact that MMA is “materially safer activity than football” based upon the information.

Also, in footnote 9 of the Opinion, the Court states it would not address Zuffa’s vagueness claim which was not before it at the time on the issue of Amateur MMA.   But, the Court later on states that despite the legislature limiting the MMA law to professional MMA, it does not “undermine the law’s rational basis.”

Payout Perspective:

The ruling today is a blow to the Zuffa legal team.  While there are 5 counts remaining, the Opinion does not necessarily give Zuffa hope that the rest of the claims will survive a further attack (i.e., dispositive motion dismissing the case in its entirety).  Moreover, the fact that in the Conclusion of the Opinion the Court indicates that the legislature would be the proper place to seek amendment to the 1997 does not lend much confidence on how the legal battle will go.

MMA Payout will have more on this in the coming days.

Filed Under: Featured, legal, New York, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bruce says

    August 18, 2012 at 12:57 am

    Although I was completely correct in predicting that the claims would go nowhere, this is no ‘blow’ to anything Zuffa as this was merely a publicity stunt, and there is nothing wrong with that. It was obvious to a graduate of even the lowest tier law school the court was not going to throw out a law passed under the state’s police power to protect the safety and well-being of its denizens. Of course there was a rational basis! Zuffa was trying to force the legislature’s hand, by relying on public/media pressure. Legal fees are tax deductible, if I am not mistaken. Zuffa will win in the end anyway.

    Reply
  2. terrencefromsoutheast says

    August 20, 2012 at 2:54 pm

    I don’t see MMA in New York anytime soon.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Does Conor McGregor still have the aura?

Court Memo and Order from CSI Entertainment-Mayweather TRO hearing

TKO responds to allegations of missing discovery in Johnson case

Judge denies CSI Entertainment’s Temporary Restraining Order

Mayweather-CSI Entertainment legal drama heats up

Mayweather legal saga continues as CSI Entertainment continues to pursue injunction

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC Cock 😂

Jed I. Goodman © @jedigoodman

UFC going with this for the UFC Oklahoma City hashtag.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Live your life in a way that if you die at 2 a.m. the whole internet doesn’t start roasting you immediately.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Senator Lindsey Graham has arrived in Hell.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

@paramountplus I want my $13 back!
Granted, I did make some money off @DanTomMMA’s UFC picks. :)
Unfortunately, no one will see this tweet because I didn’t pay for a checkmark.

UFC 329 bonuses #UFC329 #UFC https://mmapayout.com/2026/07/12/ufc-329-bonuses/

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports