• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Bellator 54: 185,000 viewers

October 19, 2011 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

MMA Junkie reports that Bellator 54 on MTV2 received an average of 185,000 viewers. Running unopposed a UFC card helped the promotion increase viewership by 80% between Bellator 53 and 54.

Via MMA Junkie:

Once again, the latest ratings continue the organization’s wildly inconsistent season-five numbers; two events have scored at least 235,000 viewers, and three have drawn 158,000 or fewer.

A replay earned an average of 116,000 viewers. The 185,000 average equated to a 0.2 rating according to The Wrestling Observer.

Payout Perspective:

A nice bounce back from 53’s 103,000 average a week ago. As MMA Junkie points out, Bellator’s ratings have been across the board and its hard to find a pattern. But, we may argue that the numbers reflect the fact that Bellator can draw a decent audience when its not running up against the UFC. This begs the question as to if Bellator should move to another night. Moving the time slot on Saturday could be another option but that could draw confusion. Bjorn Rebney indicated that he would be open to such a move in 2012. But, this week Bellator 55 runs unopposed (on TV that is) so we should see another solid ratings week.

Filed Under: Bellator, ratings, TV

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Diego says

    October 20, 2011 at 5:14 am

    M-1 drew the same #s on Showtime which equates to a much higher rating. I think Bellator’s is the better quality show, it surprises me that they continue to draw so poorly. Being on MTV2 isn’t helping them. Based on the quality of the fights they put on, and they quality of their production (which can be improved but is decent) they could do 500-600k on Spike if not more. On MTV2 they are running to stand still. They don’t get any traction and they are not growing their viewership or the drawing power of their stars.

    One thing they can do is have their champs fight more frequently. I’ve seen Grove and Schlemenko fight more often than Konrad and Lombard. Their lower-tier guys are getting more well know because they are more active and you can’t have that in a promotion.

    I personally like the tournament format, I think it’s a good way to select contenders, but keep your champs busy with other fights (which should be 5-round championship fights – every time a champion fights the belt should be on the line). Or embrace the tournament format fully and put your champs in the tournaments and make them fight their way to the top every year. They could have both a tournament champion and a regular champion like they did in K-1. Just think of how much more we would see of Eddy Alvarez and Ben Askren if they did that. You might have to pay them a little more, but I’m sure they would be glad to be busy.

    Reply
  2. Diego says

    October 20, 2011 at 5:15 am

    M-1 drew the same #s on Showtime which equates to a much higher rating. I think Bellator’s is the better quality show, it surprises me that they continue to draw so poorly. Being on MTV2 isn’t helping them. Based on the quality of the fights they put on, and they quality of their production (which can be improved but is decent) they could do 500-600k on Spike if not more. On MTV2 they are running to stand still. They don’t get any traction and they are not growing their viewership or the drawing power of their stars.

    One thing they can do is have their champs fight more frequently. I’ve seen Grove and Schlemenko fight more often than Konrad and Lombard. Their lower-tier guys are getting more well know because they are more active and you can’t have that in a promotion.

    I like the tournament format, I think it’s a good way to select contenders, but keep your champs busy with other fights (which should be 5-round championship fights – every time a champion fights the belt should be on the line). Or embrace the tournament format fully and put your champs in the tournaments and make them fight their way to the top every year. They could have both a tournament champion and a regular champion like they did in K-1. Just think of how much more we would see of Eddy Alvarez and Ben Askren if they did that. You might have to pay them a little more, but I’m sure they would be glad to be busy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

I was there and as a Husky fan it still is the best play at Husky Stadium EVER

Juan Serrano @Serrano_Sports

Ortege Jenkins days until Arizona Football

Turning Point USA logo on the mats at the #UFC #BJJ event tonight...first time I've seen this

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Get fucked man you wrote thoughtless bullshit for over a decade

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

BREAKING: The Seattle Mariners plan to call up left-hander Kade Anderson, the top pitching prospect in baseball, to start Saturday, sources tell ESPN. Anderson, the third pick in the 2025 draft, has a 1.06 ERA over 93.1 innings with 135 strikeouts, 13 walks and 47 hits allowed.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Right wing grift is so hilariously easy. Just write a very weird and creepy fantasy story you know your paper won’t publish, then make a public show of resigning because of it, and you’ll instantly have a job offer from Clay Travis in your inbox

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports