• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa and Ubisoft settle lawsuit over video game packaging

August 27, 2011 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

Zuffa announced this past week that it has settled its lawsuit with video game maker Ubisoft. The lawsuit arose out of Zuffa’s claim that Ubisoft’s “Fighter’s Uncaged” video game use of “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” in promoting its game.

The Fight Lawyer has the background here.

Via the UFC:

Zuffa and Ubisoft jointly announce the resolution of an ongoing disagreement between the companies. Ubisoft released for sale to the public a mixed martial arts video game involving street fighting entitled “Fighters Uncaged.”

On the packaging of the video game, text on the back cover invited players to “Become the ULTIMATE FIGHTING weapon!” Zuffa approached Ubisoft regarding the game and the use of “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” on the back cover.

Zuffa owns all right, title and interest in and to the federally registered “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” trademark referenced in registration numbers 2,925,669-2,941,044; 2,706,754 and 3,004,865. Zuffa and Ubisoft note that the companies have no association or business relationship of any kind.

To resolve this disagreement between Zuffa and Ubisoft, Ubisoft has ceased selling the “Fighters Uncaged” video game with the use of “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” on the back cover, and has changed the packaging of “Fighters Uncaged” such that “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” does not appear anywhere on the packaging.

Payout Perspective:

Here’s another case of the need to protect the mark of a company. As we recently saw with TapouT’s cease and desist notice, Zuffa believed that Ubisoft’s use of ULTIMATE FIGHTING infringed its trademark and needed to address the issue. Despite the need to incur legal fees, Zuffa accomplished its goal of protecting its mark by having Ubisoft change the way it sold its video game.

Filed Under: legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. mmaguru says

    August 30, 2011 at 5:16 am

    Damage already done, although I don’t think Ubisoft would have been aware of the infringement.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

IBF seeks to stay discovery in Opetaia lawsuit

TKO announce Q3 earnings

UFC 333 bonuses

FBI seeking no-bid contract with the UFC

Court denies Top Rank’s Motion to Dismiss in Keane case

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Dan Hicks’ call of the Michael Phelps-Jason Lezak relay from the 2008 Olympics will long live as one of the greatest ever.

Rest in peace to a legend.

Who let the dogs out!!!!

Murray Hill Guy @MurrayHillGuy1

This man has more range than Steph Curry in 2016…

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Here's a look at one of Rashee Rice's recent pay stubs from the Kansas City Chiefs (via his bankruptcy filing).

$43,353 in weekly earnings
- $19,570 for taxes/SS/Medicare
- $9,117 for garnishments, union dues, and fines
————
= $14,665 in take-home pay

As of October 25, Rice has

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports