• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa and Ubisoft settle lawsuit over video game packaging

August 27, 2011 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

Zuffa announced this past week that it has settled its lawsuit with video game maker Ubisoft. The lawsuit arose out of Zuffa’s claim that Ubisoft’s “Fighter’s Uncaged” video game use of “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” in promoting its game.

The Fight Lawyer has the background here.

Via the UFC:

Zuffa and Ubisoft jointly announce the resolution of an ongoing disagreement between the companies. Ubisoft released for sale to the public a mixed martial arts video game involving street fighting entitled “Fighters Uncaged.”

On the packaging of the video game, text on the back cover invited players to “Become the ULTIMATE FIGHTING weapon!” Zuffa approached Ubisoft regarding the game and the use of “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” on the back cover.

Zuffa owns all right, title and interest in and to the federally registered “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” trademark referenced in registration numbers 2,925,669-2,941,044; 2,706,754 and 3,004,865. Zuffa and Ubisoft note that the companies have no association or business relationship of any kind.

To resolve this disagreement between Zuffa and Ubisoft, Ubisoft has ceased selling the “Fighters Uncaged” video game with the use of “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” on the back cover, and has changed the packaging of “Fighters Uncaged” such that “ULTIMATE FIGHTING” does not appear anywhere on the packaging.

Payout Perspective:

Here’s another case of the need to protect the mark of a company. As we recently saw with TapouT’s cease and desist notice, Zuffa believed that Ubisoft’s use of ULTIMATE FIGHTING infringed its trademark and needed to address the issue. Despite the need to incur legal fees, Zuffa accomplished its goal of protecting its mark by having Ubisoft change the way it sold its video game.

Filed Under: legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. mmaguru says

    August 30, 2011 at 5:16 am

    Damage already done, although I don’t think Ubisoft would have been aware of the infringement.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

TKO owns this weekend

Appeals Court sets date for oral argument in Zuffa appeal

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

I also found out master improv guy Chris Harrington didn’t realize people in Seattle liked basketball to which a simp said Seattle fans didn’t support the team. lol

FADE @FadeAwayMedia

“Kev, it doesn’t make sense, it’s like having a basketball team in Seattle”

“Now Oklahoma City, i get that”

8 years ago today Elias almost caused a RIOT with this statement in Seattle.

SOME OF THE LOUDEST BOOS OF ALL TIME 😭

(2018)

Delta so excited to have #UFC332 this Saturday that the "D" for Delta Center burnt out

Fanatics Beats Back Trio of Lawsuits Alleging Monopoly Practices via @sportico

Ok, I'm sold on them.

Foul Territory @FoulTerritoryTV

Please take 60 seconds out of your day to watch this Mike Vasil interview. You will not be disappointed.

(Via: @CHSN_WhiteSox)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Houston, we don't have a problem

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports