• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Authentic Brands Group sends cease and desist to nonprofit

August 25, 2011 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

Authentic Brand Group (ABG) recently sent a cease and desist notice to nonprofit Tap Out Cancer for use of the “TapouT” trademark. As a result, the small nonprofit must rename itself.

According to its web site, Tap out Cancer is a nonprofit which raises awareness through the Brazilian Ji Jitsu community. It raises money “[t]hrough merchandise sales, special events, sponsorships and direct donations.” On its web site it noted that it is in not affiliated with TapouT. But, this was not enough to avoid ABG’s request.

When a vendor expressed concern about the nonprofit’s use of the “Tapout” name, the nonprofit sent an email to ABG requesting it receive its “blessing” to use the “Tapout” name. According to the nonprofit, a month and a half passed before it received a cease and desist email.

Tap Out Cancer’s web site reprinted a portion of ABG’s correspondence:

While we applaud your work with charitable causes, we unfortunately cannot grant permission for this use of our federally registered trademark. In addition to owning a stylized mark which you mention you tried to distinguish yourself from, we also own the word mark.

For your information, this use of our trademark in your business name is, in fact, and infringement of our intellectual property rights, including, without limitation our trademarks. It is not our desire to cause you any undue expense in connection with this matter in light of your organization’s goals. As such, we are willing to settle the matter with you at this stage if you can agree to: immediately cease and desist from the use of the trademark TapouT in any and all domain names, corporate names or otherwise, including by transferring the domain name to us.

(via Tap Out Cancer’s web site)

Payout Perspective:

The web site entry by the nonprofit reflects that they understand the reasons for ABG’s letter. While the timeframe took longer than expected, ABG is in its legal right to protect its trademarks. If not, more infringers would follow as the nonprofit points out. This has potential to be a public relations problem although the nonprofit used the “Tapout” name without permission. ABG’s correspondence is delicate and makes sure it is not impersonal in requesting that the nonprofit cease the use of “Tapout.”

Its a good cause, but the nonprofit should have asked ABG, or an attorney, prior to establishing the name of the nonprofit. Fortunately, it appears that there will be no further legal ramifications from this. While Tap Out Cancer indicated that it will lose money from merchandise it intended to sell, its better to take the loss now than to have to lose more money in legal fees to defend a lawsuit.

Filed Under: legal, Public Relations, Tapout

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Henry says

    August 26, 2011 at 10:39 am

    Tap Out Cancer is also has this on their about page:

    “I have spent the last two years of my life training in the art of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ).”

    Probably a little to close to home if you ask me. Besides the IP infringement, the ties it has to the BJJ/MMA community make ABG’s concerns understandable. People could easily assume Tap Out Cancer to be an ABG property.

    Reply
    • Jason Cruz says

      August 26, 2011 at 7:37 pm

      I agree especially since the TapouT guys were talking recently (on the MMA Hour) about getting back involved in BJJ/Grappling tournaments.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

The UFC’s undying loyalty to Trump

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit claim White’s devices “wiped” intentionally

Alex Periera accused of sexual assault, coercive sexual encounters, stalking

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

He will box relevancy and lose

bjpenndotcom @bjpenndotcom

Henry Cejudo is in talks for a boxing match against a to-be-announced opponent🥊

https://www.bjpenn.com/mma-news/henry-cejudo/henry-cejudo-boxing-debut-manager/

276% versus last month? I don’t read percentages give actual numbers my guy

Sports Business Journal @SBJ

Paramount+ saw a major spike tied to UFC’s White House card, with downloads up 276% vs. the prior 30-day average, per Sensor Tower.

MORE: https://ow.ly/1GqP50ZcOZF

The infamous (and not pc) “touchbutt”?

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

Conor McGregor was spotted in Central Park doing some stretching

(via addisonposey/TikTok)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Via @awfulannouncing, RNC chairman Joe Ruters has claimed (with a straight face) that more people watched the recent UFC event at the White House than watched the Super Bowl.

Jed I. Goodman © @jedigoodman

Dana White tells The Pat McAfee Show they had a meeting yesterday and are talking about releasing an album of the music from the White House event.

Later, Dana says Trump told him he was going to give the band a bonus

Dana White: Mr. President, I'm gonna match your bonus that

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports