• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Pacquiao settles lawsuit with Golden Boy

June 1, 2011 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

ESPN reports that Manny Pacquiao has settled his defamation lawsuit with Golden Boy Promotions CEO Richard Schaefer and Oscar de la Hoya. The lawsuit filed in 2009 stems from alleged statements claiming Pacquiao took performance enhancing drugs.

Floyd Mayweather Jr., Floyd Mayweather Sr., Roger Mayweather and Mayweather Promotions remain as defendants in the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Nevada.

The Fight Lawyer has further background of the lawsuit here.

Terms of the settlement with Golden Boy and de la Hoya were kept confidential. However, Golden Boy issued a statement of apology:

Richard Schaefer and Oscar de la Hoya, on behalf of themselves and Golden Boy Promotions, wish to make it crystal clear that we never intended to claim that Manny Pacquiao has used or is using any performance enhancing drugs, and further state that we do not have any evidence whatsoever of such use.

“Manny Pacquiao is one of the greatest fighters of all time, and we apologize if anyone construed our prior remarks as in any way claiming or even suggesting that Manny uses or has used performance enhancing drugs.”

(H/t: Bad Left Hook)

Pacquiao’s counsel reaffirmed the fact that it will continue its litigation against the Mayweathers and did not exclude adding others to the lawsuit.

Payout Perspective:

An interesting twist to this legal battle which exemplified the bad blood between Golden Boy and Top Rank when the Pacquiao and Mayweather camps could not come together on terms for a fight. Perhaps de la Hoya’s personal problems contributed to the decision to concede. A statement of concession and praise from the Golden Boy side appears to be extending the olive branch to Top Rank. As a result, Pacquiao’s counsel accepted whatever terms were negotiated and dismissed Golden Boy from the lawsuit. Maybe this is the beginning of a truce between Golden Boy and Top Rank which could lead to a Pacquiao-Mayweather fight in 2012. Then again, maybe not.

Filed Under: boxing, Golden Boy, legal, Top Rank

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    June 2, 2011 at 7:23 am

    Couldn’t they just… settle this beef in the ring? *sigh*

    Reply
  2. Machiel Van says

    June 2, 2011 at 7:27 am

    “Maybe this is the beginning of a truce between Golden Boy and Top Rank which could lead to a Pacquiao-Mayweather fight in 2012.”

    Except for the fact that the Mayweathers are still being sued by Pacquiao. The match fell apart the first time due to petty issues, and this petty lawsuit is the result. I just can’t see the brash and arrogant Mayweather backing down from his statements, or stepping up to fight.

    Reply
  3. Jason Cruz says

    June 2, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    MV,

    I agree. I do think the “truce” could help a fighter like Nonito Donaire who is embroiled in another GB vs. TR legal battle over his contract. Yet, I think what it will boil down to is $. If Mayweather really owes the IRS, he may do the fight to get out of debt.

    Reply
  4. Machiel Van says

    June 3, 2011 at 1:15 pm

    Well then I certainly hope that he does ๐Ÿ™‚

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚

Dan Canobbio @DanCanobbio

The Money Team Law Firm

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

#Zuffa filed its Reply Brief in its appeal to the 9th Circuit in the Cirkunov antitrust lawsuit. Appeal is based on district court's decision to determine whether defendants held monopoly/monopsony power and whether the contract clauses were unsconsionable #UFC

2

The mysterious $11M man or woman #UFC https://mmapayout.com/2026/08/26/the-mysterious-11m-man-or-woman/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Thank you Seattle for the privilege. How often can anyone buy a Super Bowl winning team? Humbled.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 ยท MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports