• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Judges have monitor option at UFC 130

May 22, 2011 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

UFC judges will have a little more help this Saturday when it comes to scoring UFC 130. ESPN reports that the Nevada State Athletic Commission has granted the UFC’s request to have montiors at ringside for each judge.

The judge will have the option to use the monitors to witness action that may not be readily in their sightline. The monitors will not have an audio feed and will go dark between rounds. Also, no replays will be shown.

Payout Perspective:

A good step into improving the quality of its judging, the UFC hopes that the monitors will give the judges another way to evaluate the fight. The one drawback is that it may take some time for the judges to adapt to the new piece of technology at their disposal. The other problem is that it does not necessarily mean the judges will still use their judgment in scoring fights. But, from a public relations standpoint, it shows that the UFC is being proactive in trying to make sure that fights are judged correctly and that there is no backlash from fans when a judge (or judges) make a mistake.

Filed Under: Public Relations, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    May 23, 2011 at 7:12 am

    Didn’t Keith Kizer state that the judges have always had the option to request a monitor in Nevada? I seem to remember he said that and that judges had simply chose not to use them. It sounds like they will still have a choice, but at least the monitors will actually be there right in front of them so they can’t opt out of their presence ringside. I’m a bit confused, so is this what it boils down to?

    “The other problem is that it does not necessarily mean the judges will still use their judgment in scoring fights.” I don’t understand this line. Does it mean they may still not use the monitors to influence the way they judge bouts? Or they won’t use sound judgement? Please explain, thanks Jason.

    Reply
    • Jason Cruz says

      May 23, 2011 at 10:12 am

      Hi MV,

      I think the point that I am making is that even with the use of the technology, it cannot factor in human error. So, we can give judges all the necessary tools, but they still may make a mistake (or perceived mistake).

      Reply
  2. Machiel Van says

    May 23, 2011 at 9:58 am

    Oops I was thinking of California using them 3 times in 2010, at UFC 117, UFC: Jones vs Matyushenko, and UFC 121.

    Reply
  3. Machiel Van says

    May 23, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    I agree. The availability of monitors will help, but a drastic increase in mandatory education is needed in order to remedy human error. I’m wondering if the problem will eventually solve itself, as old boxing judges will fall by the wayside and the jobs will be taken by people who have grown up watching MMA and been privy to all of the awful decisions over the years. Seems like a problem that will inevitably get better, it’s only a question of time. At least this is what I hope. Where all all of these people who’ve supposedly passed Big John’s certification course?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

The UFC’s undying loyalty to Trump

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit claim White’s devices “wiped” intentionally

Alex Periera accused of sexual assault, coercive sexual encounters, stalking

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

If I earned a UFC bonus on Sunday I’d cash out now

Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1

Trump's family crypto business is expected to soon be allowed to operate like a bank — a decision, made by the Trump administration, that would give U.S. companies a new route to steer money to the president.

"For the first time in history, a president is leaning on a bank

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Lmao! Kiss my ass Hunter Campbell 😜

Absolutely true

Mike is right

MMA Junkie @MMAJunkie

Michael Bisping scolds Pereira for 'crying' about Gane loss: 'Not a good look' https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/story/sports/ufc/2026/06/19/ufc-white-house-michael-bisping-opinion-alex-pereira-reaction-ciryl-gane-loss-bad-look/90618307007/?taid=6a35828bfbb36b00014b16b4&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The UFC event has destroyed the grass on the Ellipse in front of the White House.

REUTERS/Aaron Schwartz

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports