John Morgan of MMAJunkie reports that the UFC has already begun the preliminary research necessary to determine whether an office in China is feasible and worthwhile. The goal of the UFC is to begin expanding its reach with localized versions of TUF in several different markets and eventually to begin promoting 100 shows per year.
The growth prospects for the UFC are astounding. As recently as 2007, the UFC held just 19 events. White said he envisions a day in the not-too-distant future when the company could hold as many as 100 events annually including single nights with multiple events on multiple continents.
“This is is a work in progress,” White told MMAjunkie.com (www.mmajunkie.com). “We bought this company, and we were doing five fights a year. If you would have told me six or seven years ago that we’d be doing 34 fights a year, I would have said, ‘That’s impossible. It’ll never happen. That’s crazy.’ We’re probably going to end up doing 100 fights a year.
“We could have a show [in the U.S.] on Saturday night and five more going on in five other countries. That’s what’s going to eventually happen. It’s figuring this thing out, putting the pieces together, and like I said, it’s a work in progress. But I’m telling you guys, I said it years ago, and I’ve been saying it – how big this thing is going to be. I think people are now really starting to realize how big this thing is really going to be.”
Payout Perspective:
To promote 100 events, the UFC assumes the following will be in place:
- Fighter availability (quantity and quality)
- Worldwide legalization and acceptance
- Access to substantial distribution in each market
I tend to think that 100 shows per year is a possibility, but the time frame for such an accomplishment is absolutely up in the air and certainly isn’t something that will happen within the next 5 years.
Fighter availability (quantity and quality)
The UFC currently does 30+ shows per year with a roster of ~220 fighters and that number is closer to 260 when you consider the number of guys that are signed and then cut after one or two fights in any given year. The UFC would probably need 900-1000 fighters to do 100 shows and that’s conservative considering the global nature of its 100 show ambitions would strain the ability of fighters to compete more than 2-3 times per year.
The surge in the sport’s popularity is driving a lot of new interest in participation among elite athletes, but it’s going to take a great deal of time to develop the talent necessary to host 100 UFC events a year. This, unless the UFC is willing to sacrifice product quality — especially with its undercards. Yet, I wouldn’t suggest that, seeing as top-to-bottom fight quality is a key point of differentiation between MMA and boxing. The overall strength and entertainment value of a UFC card in its entirety is very much a part of the value proposition which it has used to build the sport.
Moreover, promoting 100 shows in a year would almost necessitate the inclusion of further weight classes at 125, 135, 145, and possibly 225 to give the UFC a chance to fill all of these cards. What does that mean for the WEC? What does that mean for other promotions? I suppose part of the assumption here is that, if the UFC gets to this point, its size and scale afford it so many advantages that it really does become the NFL of MMA (meaning you’re not going to have Fedor with Strikeforce or Aoki/Kawajiri in Dream).
Worldwide legalization
Despite the success of MMA in North America over the last five years, the sport is still not legalized in major markets like New York and Ontario — the UFC’s road to worldwide legalization will be no less tumultuous. I fully expect that history will repeat itself; and, when you take into account the cultural differences that exist between North America and other regions of the world, the road to legalization could be an even longer haul for the UFC in certain international markets.
In Germany, Austria, and France the thought of hitting a downed opponent is near sacrilegious to the mainstream sports fan. More than that, their consumer population is far more sensitive to violence, in general, which will very much make the sport a long-term proposition.
China is a very attractive market, but also one that can be unpredictable and very difficult to do business. The WWE have had a very difficult time penetrating the market (as have bigger companies like Google), because its conservative culture governed by a semi-communist state that operates under an “our way or the highway” policy. Although, the addition of Flash Entertainment (the Abu Dhabi state-owned company that bought 10% of Zuffa in 2009) will certainly help, because they have the connections and clout to get meetings with the key decision makers.
Moreover, I tend to think that people often over-estimate the future size and purchasing power of markets like China and India based solely upon what they’ve heard (much of which is exaggeration on the part of the American political and media bodies fearfully looking over their shoulders at the next challengers to American superiority). Many have suggested that China’s GDP will soon exceed that of the US (and possibly triple the US by 2050), but the country has its own economic and political challenges ahead. For example, the combination of nearly ubiquitous cigarette smoking, airborne pollutants, water contamination (nearly 33% of their fresh water is undrinkable), and the one-child policy will soon put a strain on China’s already questionable health care infrastructure and force a relatively small and proportionately shrinking middle class to support a very large and very sick group of elderly. None of which bodes well for China’s economy in the long-term.
The UFC and Dana White may very well come to realize that “getting the US done” was easier than expanding globally.
Access to distribution
The future of television might be the internet (sometimes I think Dana reads the site), but it’s not going to happen overnight and its not going to happen easily. There are many powerful people earning a lot of money through the status quo (i.e., television networks and cable/satellite providers) that really don’t have much incentive or desire to change the existing model. It’s going to be a tooth-and-nail fight to switch the medium.
Thus, I’m betting on a rather slow change and proliferation of internet-based television, which suggests that the distribution necessary for 100 shows a year will necessitate a hybrid system. Not everyone is going to switch at once, which means the UFC still wants to be on traditional television for now (but it will take internet-based distribution in markets like China or Germany where it can’t get to television, in the mean time).
What does the UFC need to do next?
Be patient.
I understand the temptation — the potential of MMA is huge — but it would be unwise to rush global expansion beyond the current capabilities of the firm. The UFC risks stretching everyone and everything too thin, which would utterly kill product quality in the long-term.
Therefore:
- Let the localized versions of TUF do their magic: develop regional talents, build regional fan bases, and encourage grassroots development.
- Give the UFC programming time to develop a following in the over 150+ markets it now resides.
- Further push merchandise and collectibles into these foreign markets to give the UFC additional presence.
In the mean time, concentrate on dominance within existing markets and work to develop further competencies in marketing, public relations, and digital media. The UFC is good in these areas, but it could also definitely improve. There’s no such thing as perfect; and if there were, it wouldn’t be good enough.
jv says
100 shows a year makes no sense unless they can get off the PPV model. With tax a PPV costs me just under $70. $70 x 100 = $7000. Few people can afford to or would be willing to spend that kind of money to watch TV. So what you would get is a watering down of the number of buys per show. That just doesn’t make sense.
On top of that if people can’t follow their fighters regularly because they are picking shows they will start to loose interest. Carwin vs Lesnar is an interesting fight if you have seen them both fight before. If you haven’t then they are just generic fighters.
mmaguru says
Nice write up Kelsey. 100 shows would require major changes in how the UFC is managed and ultimately Dana would have to let go of making major decisions which I’m not sure he is ready to do.
I could easily see them doing a show a week – 2 PPV’s and 2 for TV. That would bring the cume up to around 52 shows a year. Two additional weight classes plus a 10% increase in the rest of the roster would be spot on to get it done.
I know anything is possible, but they would have to do something like 12 shows a year in Japan, 12 shows a year in China, 12 shows a year in India, 12 shows a year in the Middle East and Europe, 12 shows a year in South America and even then you’re not at 100.
Brain Smasher says
JV
Dana has said many times the UFC doesnt put on shows expecting everyone to buy every card. The UFC puts out a product. You as a consumer have to choose which products you will buy. Pepsi makes many different soft drinks. You dont buy everyone when you go to the store or get thirsty. You choose which you want.
Kelsey
Can you fix the centering of the article. Part of the left side is cut off and its hard for more to follw.
Article. I think 100 shows is not that far fetched. The UFC puts on 30 in the US. If they can just get 3 other countries to the level MMA is in the USA and keep them supplied then its would be easy to add 20+ events just for those markets. You dont need world wide dominance or exceptance. Just make MMA big in 3 countries. Judging by the success of events in UK, Canada, and other countries. It seems more that likely.
As for the shows themselves i dont think most of these cards will even be that great with talent. As we have seen the UFC can draw with any level of talent. They out on a show. So i can see the UFC acting as their own minor leage in creating talent on these small (Local Ultimate Fight Night type) shows. After these fighters build skill, crediblity, experience, and a fan following they will gradually move up to national shows on PPV.
The downside of this is 2 major ones i see. The perseved quality of the UFC brand. People have to know which fighters are the good fighters. IF yuo slap UFC on every local show you do then diminish the meaning of being an “Ultmate Fighter”. People might lose tract of how special a card with GSP is when all 100 cards are called UFC’s.
Secondly the creation of fighters. Fighters at the bottom i fear will go the boxing route of being “Handled”. You you are starting out locally in China on a low ametuer level UFC. You will probably need to win 15-20 fights with few if any loss’. Keep in mind you are fighting for a spot on big UFC cards with thousands of other UFC fighters in other countries. You wont see anymore guys in the UFC at 5-0 or 8-0. There will be just to many of them on these small shows. So now you have trainers and promoters hand pickings fights to slowing bring some fighters along like Boxers do. They are 25-0 before they ever face a guy who has even respectable skill. ts not until they are 30+-0 before you find out if someone is a “built” fraud or a legit fighter. I hope MMA never comes to that. BUt with 100 shows you will no doubt have to have many more fights to get to the top than before.
mmaguru says
Brian,
I think your missing the big picture here. It’s just not going to happen in the next 5 years without a major overall of how Zuffa operates. I don’t think Dana would settle for a watered down product no mater what the market is. Growing in a market like North America is no problem as the main factors are all the same, once you enter an unknown market your going to be in for a rough ride unless your willing to allow some control to be lost. Strikeforce has a better chance of doing 100 shows as they understand it requires co-promotion from the outset. Come back in 5 years and let’s see what the landscape looks like.
william hardiek says
I think this is actually feasible. WEC has around 8-10 events a year, UFC held 20 events last year. The UFC offices in Europe and Canada combined with the possibility of the UFC opening offices in China/Asia, Middle East/ Africa, South America/ Central America, Australia, Russia and Japan. This isnt a far fetched idea at all. In the next 10 years it is possible to see the UFC gain favor in these markets. If Zuffa is able to pull this off, and adopt the Unified Rules of MMA the UFC’s brand of MMA will be universal.
Kelsey Philpott says
Smasher,
What browser are you using? It looks perfectly fine to me and I didn’t set any sort of alignment on anything. What part is out of whack?
KP
Kelsey Philpott says
To comment:
I don’t think they move to 2 PPVs a week; that would be ridiculous.
I think they probably develop a clear set of tiers:
– Local shows that are taped and chopped into hour-long programs that showcase prospects
– UFN
– ESPN/HBO type shows
– PPVs.
There would be a clear distinction in the type of talent that each tier of event would utilize – making it easy for fans to determine what they wanted to watch. The hardcores would, of course, watch everything and the casuals would tune into the ESPN or PPVs when it suited them.
That’s how I’d do it, at least.