• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

UFN 21: Payout Perspective

April 1, 2010 by Kelsey Philpott 3 Comments

Welcome to another edition of Payout Perspective! Just days after UFC 111 we’re now looking at UFN 21: Florian vs. Gomi, which was held in Charlotte, North Carolina at the Bojangles Coliseum. In addition to Florian-Gomi, the event also featured a co-main event between heavyweights Roy Nelson and Stefan Struve.

Florian taps Gomi, likely eyeing Boston

Florian used his reach and jab to pick apart Gomi in the early going, then finished him off with a rear-naked in the third. It was a fairly impressive fight for Florian, but I’m not sure it should be enough to earn him another title shot. The decision will likely depend on who wins the lightweight title fight next week, and if it’s BJ Penn, whether he stays at lightweight.

The most attractive option for the UFC might be to give Florian the next title shot and hold the title fight in Boston on August 28th. The gate for that fight would be tremendous on account of Florian being a Mass-native, especially considering his ability to work with the media and promote the fight locally.

Regardless, I’d expect Florian to fight on that card – title shot or no.

Nelson knocks out Struve, could face dos Santos

Nelson demonstrated the striking power we all knew he possessed and dropped Struve with an over-hand right. The prevailing thought going into this fight was that a victory would earn Nelson a date with up-and-coming heavyweight Junior dos Santos. The nature of his win probably increased the likelihood of that match-up, if only because of the potential for a fight between two heavy-handed heavyweights. Nelson is an experienced veteran that could also test dos Santos on the ground should he get hit early and decide against throwing with the Brazilian.

Joe Rogan made a comment during the broadcast that Nelson’s figure might lead to some opponents underestimating his fighting skills. Likewise, potential sponsors might be reluctant to job on board with the fighter, because he doesn’t quite reflect the attributes the brands are looking to communicate. Only Tapout and UltimateFighter.com were listed on his shorts and banner.

If I were Nelson’s management I’d look to play up his appearance where future sponsorships are concerned. How effective would a sponsor from Manwich or Campbell’s Chunky Soup or Bud Light, for example, be with a guy like Nelson? Not only would Nelson transfer the right sort of attributes to the sponsor product, but it would communicate a sense of humor and effectively catch the eye of the audience.

Sponsorship Watch

The event was sponsored by the UFC’s regular group – Bud Light, Harley-Davidson, Tapout, etc. – but we did see the addition of one curious entry, National Rent-A-Center. RAC isn’t the typical UFC sponsor, but its target audience skews pretty well toward the MMA demo: young, disposable cash, commitment free. The company does come off as a second-rate sponsor in comparison to more mainstream, sports-oriented brands, but it obviously paid pretty well for the privilege when you look at the activation it did on the advertising side of things around the event (i.e., the numerous Hulk Hogan spots).

The ad space sold around the event was also your typical fare: DirecTV, U.S. Marines, Subway, Castrol, movie (Kick-Ass), game (Splinter Cell) etc. Perhaps the most interesting commercial all night was the Tapout commercial; very poorly pixelated, but well done nonetheless. Hopefully they can fix that up.

Filed Under: opinion and analysis, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jose Mendoza says

    April 1, 2010 at 11:29 am

    Kelsey,

    I really liked that TapOut commercial. It also gave Jake Shields and Dan Henderson some added exposure for Strikeforce, which brings up the question, how is TapOut one of the only brands allowed to sponsor UFC and non-UFC fighters. RVCA did the same thing when they sponsored Fedor on CBS (was already sponsoring BJ Penn and Vitor in the UFC) and got banned from the UFC for doing so. According to rumor, had to drop Fedor to get back into the UFC.

    Jose

    Reply
  2. Brain Smasher says

    April 1, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    Maybe because the UFC is involved with Tapout.

    Reply
  3. Jose Mendoza says

    April 1, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    Brain Smasher,

    The UFC having some stake in TapOut has come up before, but then wouldn’t that make them even less likely to sponsor fighters outside of the UFC? It’s an interesting situation nonetheless.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Ortiz files motion to confirm injunction over

Congressional Report on Ali Revival Act released

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Bob, he played for the Angels

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

BREAKING: Four-Star RB Jeremy Adeyanju has Committed to Washington, he tells me for @Rivals

The 6’0 215 RB from Phoenix, AZ chose the Huskies over USC, Michigan, and UCLA

“All Glory to God. Blessed to be home. GO DAWGS ☔️”

https://www.on3.com/rivals/jeremy-adeyanju-282401/

I was listening to the Ark-Vandy game in the car and thought I heard the name and then had to check…

Pray for rain

MMA Fighting @MMAFighting

Mailbag: How do we save the UFC White House card? https://www.mmafighting.com/ufc/476379/mailbag-how-do-we-save-the-ufc-white-house-card

#UFC Fight Night 269 Bonus Winners https://mmapayout.com/2026/03/15/ufc-fight-night-269-bonus-winners/

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports