• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

CSAC States Position on Medical Marijuana

November 30, 2009 by Kelsey Philpott 2 Comments

The California State Athletic Commission has released its latest positional ruling with regard to how it intends to deal with the use of medical marijuana amongst its licensed fighters:

The California State Athletic Commission’s position is that Marijuana is a banned substance pursuant to Rule 303 and that any positive drug test may result in discipline.

 

The California Supreme Court has weighed in on “Medical Marijuana” in the employment context and has found that an employer may discipline an employee for off-duty medical marijuana use. The court found that the Compassionate Use Act did not legalize marijuana use per se, but merely provided a defense to criminal charges under particular circumstances. The Court acknowledged that marijuana still had a potential for abuse and that employers continued to have a legitimate interest in whether an employee uses the drug. The Court declined to extend the protections of the Compassionate Use Act any further than the plain language of the Act and into the employer-employee relationship.

 

Although the question springs from professional licensing rather than employment, much of the Court’s rationale applies. Because the Compassionate Use Act only provides a defense to criminal charges, any argument that the Act would allow an athlete to use the drug without consequences to his or her license must fail. If the Court were to take up a similar challenge to discipline of a licensee, it would likely find that the Commission has a legitimate interest in whether or not an athlete uses the drug because marijuana could slow a fighter’s reflexes and endanger his or her health and safety in the ring or the cage.

 

Therefore, given the limited reach of the Compassionate Use Act and the rationale of the Supreme Court in Ross v. RagingWire Telcomm, the Commission may safely discipline an athlete without running afoul of any law or court decision.

Payout Perspective:

The Nick Diaz vs. Takanori Gomi fight is probably the case that comes to mind of most when thinking about the issue of marijuana use in MMA. Diaz had his gogoplata victory over Gomi ruled a no contest as the result of his positive test for marijuana and was suspended for six months. He claimed he only used marijuana for medical purposes.

Diaz would later go on to boast that he could beat any drug test with 8 days notice, but was conspicuously absent from his required drug tests for what was supposed to be a welterweight championship fight in Strikeforce in August.

Filed Under: CSAC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. mma guru says

    November 30, 2009 at 9:05 am

    So does this mean that they can deny a guy like Nick a license if he tests positive even though he has a medical reason for taking the substance?

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. CSAC Confirms Stance on Medical Marijuana, AKA "The Diaz Rule" | MMA Fight News - MMA News, MMA Gear, MMA Training says:
    December 1, 2009 at 11:31 am

    […] went ahead and made their case for coming down hard on the Nick Diaz’s of the sporting world, issuing a statement that draws upon state supreme court precedent to arrive at this conclusion: Because the Compassionate Use Act only provides a defense to criminal charges, any argument that […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Everyone revolving around the Ronda ecosystem. Same as it ever was.

MMA Fighting @MMAFighting

Arnold Allen isn't a fan of Ronda Rousey’s "stupid" digs at Valentina Shevchenko and the UFC

📰 https://mma-fighting.visitlink.me/o9H_af

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Judge Orders Everyone to Know This Piece of Shit from Covington, Not Seattle: https://tinyurl.com/ysfbw6vh

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Nate Diaz saying he doesn't want a fake beef is number one bullshit.
Guy is a long-term vegan he eats impossible Burger's and beyond meat products all the time the actual definition of fake beef.

As US Taxpayers, we will all have to pay for Hokit’s CTE

Martin P @MartinP_MMA

He’ll be dead before this is over

Aaron Rupar @atrupar

Trump: "Think of it -- we were in Vietnam for 19 years! I'm doing this for two, two and a half months."

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports