• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

What’s Wrong with The Ultimate Fighter?

June 11, 2008 by tmartin Leave a Comment

The Ultimate Fighter has played a pivotal role in the popularity rise of the Ultimate Fighting Championship. The television show has produced a host of major stars and big money fights in the past three and a half years. However, the current season of the show has produced a feeling of general malaise.

Ratings are the lowest for any season. CB Dollaway is the only fighter on the season who appears to have star potential. But the most confounding development is the limited buzz for the fight between charismatic coaches Quinton “Rampage” Jackson and Forrest Griffin.

When the season began, the choice of Jackson and Griffin as coaches was widely praised. Both are high level fighters with larger-than-life personalities. The feeling was their presence would increase ratings and lead to a very high pay-per-view buy rate for their championship fight.

In fact, tickets for their fight have sold slower than for the most recent Las Vegas event featuring B.J. Penn vs. Sean Sherk. It seems highly unlikely Griffin vs. Jackson will do UFC’s highest buy rate of the year as was once predicted. The question is thus why that fight hasn’t sparked the interest that was almost universally expected?

The answer to that question comes in the one key miscalculation the UFC made: the relationship between the coaches. As much as some would like to pretend otherwise, boxing and MMA have always been built around feuds and always will be. This doesn’t mean that you need to have fighters pretending to hate each other for every major event. However, it is hard to build a fight when there isn’t at least a sense of tension between the fighters.

Jackson and Griffin on The Ultimate Fighter don’t appear to have even a competitive rivalry, let alone a grudge. The Ortiz-Shamrock, Hughes-Serra and Penn-Pulver seasons of the show featured coaches who wanted to best the other at everything. Fans were left thinking, “If these guys want to beat each other so badly at bowling or ping pong, imagine how seriously they are taking their fight.” Jackson and Griffin have had the exact opposite effect. By joking their way through the show, fans are left thinking they don’t care as much about their fight as they actually do.

With UFC promising the most shocking development in Ultimate Fighter history this week, there is still time for Jackson vs. Griffin to become a hotly anticipated fight. But as it stands, their good-natured personalities have backfired in achieving the ultimate goal of the show, which is to build a big money fight at the end.

Filed Under: marketing, opinion and analysis, TUF, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Wolfe downgrades TKO after strong rally

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

For the first time, here's a link to "Private Equity in College Sports," written by @SunealBedi, John Holden and myself, and forthcoming in Volume 111 of @MinnesotaLawRev:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6349318

Failed MMA fighter, but successful plumber and drafter of a cut and paste version of the mUhammAD aLi act takes over of Homeland Security

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Kristi, you’re fired!

(Yes, I had this ready)

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports