• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

UFC issues formal statement on UFC.com security breach

January 25, 2012 by Jason Cruz 6 Comments

The UFC issued a formal statement via MMA Fighting regarding Sunday’s security breach of the UFC.com web site. The response comes two days after the hacking of the web site.

Via MMA Fighting:

On Sunday, January 22nd, the UFC.com website was redirected by a criminal hacker to another website. The UFC website was quickly restored to the control of the UFC, and there is no evidence suggesting that any confidential information belonging to the company or its customers was compromised by the re-direction of the website. UFC representatives are continuing to investigate the matter and are working with law enforcement agents to prosecute those involved.

Payout Perspective:

While there is nothing wrong with the statement, the tardiness of the assurance that all is well with the site is a concern. As MMA Fighting points out, the recent Zappos.com security breach saw a swifter response from the online shoe retailer. Still, the online shoe retailer is facing at least one lawsuit related to the breach. In addition, White’s twitter response that he basically did not care is of concern since UFC.com also acts as a storefront for its fans. Its a place where the UFC sells product and asks for buyer’s credit card and personal information.

Filed Under: Public Relations, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    January 25, 2012 at 8:14 am

    Oh that Dana and his Twitter… he should have some sort of 30 min. delay on his tweets so he has some time to think about them first.

    Reply
  2. Jason Cruz says

    January 25, 2012 at 9:43 am

    MV,

    I think that’s a good idea. Its like after any NBA or NFL game. There’s a 15 minute or so buffer after a game before the media is allowed into the locker room to talk to players so they can compose themselves.

    Reply
  3. Diego says

    January 25, 2012 at 10:22 am

    The UFC need to up their front office game. Certain things are great to have Dana the Hype-Man comment on in real time (e.g. crazy Russians) certain things need an official response from Zuffa Incorporated (e.g. someone may have stolen my credit card information from the UFC website). Dana is going to have to learn which is which.

    Reply
  4. BrainSmasher says

    January 25, 2012 at 6:10 pm

    I dont see what the big deal is. Someone hacked into their site. The last thing you want to do is comment on something before you look into it fully. The hackers still can do damage. It would be silly for Dana to give the perps any staisfaction. He also wouldnt want to say anything to cause them to do any more damage or draw a lot of attention to the matter. He also wouldnt want to assure anyone nothing was taken and it wont happen again until he cant confidently make those statements.

    Reply
  5. CodeMaster says

    January 27, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    Let’s put this into perspective.

    The hackers managed to insert a link which redirected UFC fans to another site.

    This is like vandals going up to a Bank sign late at night and overpainting it and with another name.

    Is the bank compromised because the exterior sign was spray painted? Is the money in the vault in danger because of this vandalism?

    The UFC should reassure subscribers–but the breach does not sound that serious.

    If I was Dana White, I would hire some top-notch cyber-detectives. Hackers erroneously believe that they cannot be traced–but with a little effort and ingenuity, they can be caught–and arrested–no matter where in the world they reside.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. UFC Fight Pass: How exactly do you cancel a subscription? | The MMA Report says:
    January 15, 2014 at 5:40 am

    […] Again, the UFC Fight Pass product is still going through a bevy of enhancements so this cancellation section is probably being worked on right now, but without having a proper setup and termination procedure from the get-go, it truly concerns me. Especially when you have to consider how the UFC is storing credit-card info and how much can we really trust them, when they have already been through a security breach? […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Lawsuit seeks to shutdown UFC White House event

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

From the Judge's Order today denying the injunction. The Court states that plaintiffs did not have a specific harm to satisfy the threshold for an injunction #UFCWhiteHouse #TKO #UFC

Judge Amit Mehta, the judge that denied the #UFC White House injunction, was a Obama appointee. Just another reason to Blame Obama

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Only 16% of Americans approve of Trump holding UFC event at White House.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ALERT: Judge Amit Metha rules UFC event can proceed at White House, ruling harm to plaintiffs would only be "temporary" & that the challenge came too late

"Considerable time, labor & funding.. has gone into organizing the UFC fight and lead-up events"

Full contact 5 days a week 😂

MMA Mania @mmamania

Mania Mailbag: Do we trane UFC? https://www.mmamania.com/mma-mailbag-questions-answers-ufc/449583/mania-mailbag-do-we-trane-ufc?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports