• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Chavez, Jr. files lawsuit against NAC

December 5, 2019 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

MPO has obtained the Complaint filed by boxer Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. against the Nevada Athletic Commission for declining a drug test administered by the Commission. The boxer hopes to prevail with an injunction filed in conjunction with the Complaint as he has a fight December 20, 2019 in Phoenix, Arizona that is at risk of being cancelled.

The lawsuit, filed in Clark County, Nevada, argues that Chavez did not hold a Nevada boxer’s license and was not subject to a NAC drug test.  According to the Complaint, an October 24, 2019 drug test at the Wild Card Boxing Club in Hollywood, California was turned down by Chavez.  As a result, on November 20, 2019 the NAC issued a temporary suspension to Chavez for his failure to participate in the drug test.  Chavez contends that since he was not licensed by the Commission, he had no obligation to participate in the drug testing process. He also argued in his complaint that the suspension of an unlicensed boxer is not permitted by law.

Chavez, Jr. is scheduled to fight Daniel Jacobs in Phoenix, Arizona on December 20th.  The fight, originally scheduled for the MGM Grand Garden Arena on the same date, was moved to Phoenix due to the November 20th ruling by the NAC.  The lawsuit hopes to allow Chavez, Jr. to fight despite the denial of a drug test.

A preliminary injunction will take place to determine whether Chavez, Jr. can fight on December 20th.  If granted, the fight is on, if not, one might expect that it would add to any potential damages in the lawsuit.

Complaint by Jason Cruz on Scribd

Payout Perspective:

Its important to note that Ross Goodman is the attorney for Chavez, Jr.  He also represented Wanderlei Silva in a similar case which went up to the Nevada State Supreme Court to address the issue of whether the NAC had jurisdiction over an unarmed combatant not licensed within the state.  The State Supreme Court did not issue a ruling as the underlying issues regarding Silva’s ban was not clarified by the commission.  Thus, there was no clear ruling on the issue.  Here, Goodman may get a second chance to determine what might be a loophole in the NAC code.  MMA Payout will keep you posted.

 

Filed Under: boxing, Jr., legal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

should we REALLY make our schedule release video in halo?

yes yes yesyes
yesyes yes yes yes
yes yes yes yes yes
yes yesyes yes yes
yes yesye yes yes
yes yes yesyes

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

@SeahawksForever Chargers social media

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Live Nation has announced plans for a 5,500-capacity music venue in SODO, across from T-Mobile Park.

The venue will be an addition to the existing Boxyard development that houses Hatback Bar & Grille, Steelheads Alley, and Victory Hall.

The NCAA House Settlement Is Suddenly Unsettling via @sportico

Benson Henderson is returning to MMA with the #PFL. Please no.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports