• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Wanderlei Silva sues NSAC seeking reversal of lifetime ban, fine

January 20, 2015 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

MMA Fighting reports that Wanderlei Silva has filed a lawsuit against the Nevada State Athletic Commission.  Silva claims that the commission overstepped its boundaries in issuing him a lifetime ban last year.

In addition to the ban, the NSAC issued a $70,000 fine this past September.  The punishment arose out of his failure to take a drug test in lead-up to a fight with Chael Sonnen this past July.  As we know, the fight never happened.

“This case encapsulates agency aggrandizement at its worst where disciplinary ation was taken against a non-licensed person,” reads the introduction of Silva’s Complaint filed by Ross Goodman in Clark County, Nevada’ District Court.

Silva’s attorney argues that the NSAC did not have jurisdiction over Silva since he was not licensed in the state of Nevada at the time officials attempted to drug test Silva.  Silva’s attorney claims that the statutes which the NSAC must follow only pertain to a “licensee.”

Silva is looking for the NSAC ruling to be reversed and set aside which could the clear pathway for Silva to fight in Nevada again.

Goodman is familiar with combatting the NSAC.  In April 2012, he sued the NSAC on behalf of Nick Diaz.

W. Silva v. Bennett and NSAC

Court filing via MMA Fighting.

Payout Perspective:

As we indicated in December, the process for appeal of an administrative ruling is usually through filing a lawsuit seeking a “petition for review.” Still, we wonder why Silva is going through this legal process when he could work around the suspension in Nevada and still fight. Silva’s attorney makes an interesting legal argument based on the Nevada statutes which the commission must follow. We will see how the judicial system handles interpretation of these statutes and this case.

Filed Under: Featured, legal, NSAC, regulation, review, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Rams trading for Myles Garrett just to watch the Seahawks hoist the Lombardi in SoFi is gonna make for some insane crashouts in LA 🤣

A shot to the nuts is always funny...except the dude that got hit.

Baseball Quotes @BaseballQuotes1

Dude fouled a pitch off his nuts and the camera cuts to the first baseman losing it 😂😂

DO WE GOT A POLYMARKET ON IF IRAN WILL BOMB SOMETHING DURING UFC WHITE HOUSE?

FIFA World Cup brings anticipation, criticism via @nwasianweekly

Some of the comments... :-)

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

Dana White Goes Card Shopping | Spends Over $36,000 On Rare Tom Brady, M... https://youtu.be/0Jgx9ubjnCA?si=Z3oGlNvHhk_1g1qe via @YouTube

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports