• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

FOIA request reveals little information on government investigation of Zuffa

February 7, 2013 by Jason Cruz 3 Comments

Recently, I made a FOIA request to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) inquiring about its investigation of Zuffa with respect to its purchase of Strikeforce.  The documents provided under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) did not reveal anything of note.

The documents consisted of 5 pages. Two pages were form letters, dated January 25, 2012, from the FTC to law firms in the Washington D.C. area (apparently) representing the parties advising that it had closed its investigation.

The letters indicated that the FTC investigated whether the acquisition of Explosion Entertainment, LLC (“Strikeforce”) by Zuffa, LLC violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act or Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

“Upon further review of this matter, it appears that no further action is warranted by the Commission,” read both letters.  The form letters went on to say that the closure of the investigation did not mean that a violation had not been committed…or that one had. It also reserved the right to reopen the investigation if it deemed necessary.  Legal enough for you?

The other three pages were a document entitled “Document Logging Form” which did not reveal anything about facts on the investigation.  It appeared to be a checklist for closing a file.

The FTC cited rules which preclude responsive documents which contain staff analyses, opinions and recommendations.  These are exempt from FOIA.

Payout Perspective:

A little late on getting this information but you didn’t miss much.  The FOIA process was fairly easy and the FTC responded quickly.  Of course, the information that would have been interesting were exempt from FOIA disclosure.  So, the official rendering of the Zuffa investigation by the government is that it had looked into its acquisition of Strikeforce but found no reason to conduct further action into investigating the purchase.

Filed Under: legal, regulation, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    February 7, 2013 at 3:57 pm

    FOIA had a nasty trip to the dentist awhile back. No teeth left to speak of. It used to be really useful for conducting historical research too 🙁

    Reply
    • Jason Cruz says

      February 7, 2013 at 4:06 pm

      MV,

      lol. I actually changed the headline to “little” from “no” information to be accurate. We did get information on how the FTC styles its form letters.

      Reply
  2. barzy says

    February 9, 2013 at 2:15 pm

    I can’t say this is a big suprise. the premise was flawed from the begining. there is ample competition especially with the rise of bellator on spike.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

FBI seeking no-bid contract with the UFC

Court denies Top Rank’s Motion to Dismiss in Keane case

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Dementia characteristic no lie

Orla Joelsen @OJoelsen

What on earth is going on here?

Why is President Trump, spitting on the floor during a rally in North Carolina?

Cubs’ Finances Could Be Unsealed in Rooftop Suit Ahead of CBA Fight via @sportico

First #NBA game of the season and Detroit goes down big only to come back within 5 in the 3rd quarter

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Adam Silver looked at the unemployment rate and said fuck it start the season at 3pm

Boston-San Antonio #NBA Finals

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports