• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa Sues for TheUltimateFighter.com

May 5, 2010 by Kelsey Philpott 1 Comment

J.R. Riddell of Sherdog.com is reporting that Zuffa has filed a lawsuit against the owner of theultimatefighter.com in attempt to gain ownership of the domain name. Zuffa currently uses the similar UltimateFighter.com to promote its reality TV series The Ultimate Fighter. Hence, its concern.

In the complaint, Zuffa alleges that it began using a number of “The Ultimate Fighter” trademarks as early as 2003. Records of the United States Patent and Trademark Office show that Zuffa filed to register trademarks in “The Ultimate Fighter” in June 2004. Zuffa’s complaint also alleges that in January 2004, an individual named Anton Resnick registered the domain name at issue with the domain registration company, eNom, Inc. Zuffa claims Resnick never used the domain name in connection with a legitimate commercial fair use, and so should therefore be deemed a “cybersquatter” under the provisions of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (United States Code, Title 15, section 1125(d)). Zuffa cited this Act in asking the court to restrain and enjoin eNom from transferring the domain name to any other party. Zuffa’s prayer for relief includes a request for a permanent injunction requiring eNom to transfer the registration to Zuffa.

Payout Perspective:

In March, Zuffa launched the ad-supported UltimateFighter.com with the aim of increasing the reach of the popular reality TV series. The website features every episode and fight from all eleven seasons of the show. The website is somewhat of an experiment; one that might eventually allow Zuffa to host entire events on the internet through the same ad-supported model (or even a branded content model). Another upside to the ad-supported website is that it gives the company a host of tracking options that allow it to really drill down on viewership patterns and demographics.

Thus, understandably, Zuffa is looking to protect its interests by gaining ownership of similar domain names. I can’t help but be reminded of the MikeRoweSoft incident of a few years ago, but it would seem as though this issue is past the point of sending the domain holder an Xbox and calling things even.

Filed Under: legal, TUF, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Joe says

    May 12, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    Zuffa’s claim isn’t that strong. That’s why they’re suing in federal court under the ACPA instead of engaging in an arbitration under the UDRP.

    They’re betting that they can throw their weight around and that this defendant can not afford the cost of litigation.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Wolfe downgrades TKO after strong rally

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

For the first time, here's a link to "Private Equity in College Sports," written by @SunealBedi, John Holden and myself, and forthcoming in Volume 111 of @MinnesotaLawRev:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6349318

Failed MMA fighter, but successful plumber and drafter of a cut and paste version of the mUhammAD aLi act takes over of Homeland Security

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Kristi, you’re fired!

(Yes, I had this ready)

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports