• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Phil Davis files potential class action antitrust lawsuit against TKO/Zuffa for non-UFC fighters

May 30, 2025 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Former UFC light heavyweight Phil Davis has filed a lawsuit in the Federal Court of Nevada which seeks to turn the business of MMA on its head.

Davis’ lawsuit is an offshoot of the now-settled Cung Le, et al. v. Zuffa, the current Kajan Johnson, et al. v. Zuffa and the recently filed Mikhail Cirkunov, et al. lawsuits. The premise is that Davis claims that Zuffa has used its monopoly and monopsony power to suppress fighter pay via anticompetitive measures. Davis is arguing that not only has Zuffa utilized its market power to suppress the pay of UFC fighters, it also has harmed the entire market of professional MMA fighters.

Also of note, Davis argues that the Relevant Input Market that Zuffa is suppressing through purported anticompetitive means is Professional MMA Fighters. He also argues there’s a subset of fighters – the headliners.

Through the controls of the Relevant Input Market, Davis argues that the UFC has used it for anticompetitive means.

Davis argues that the UFC market control disturbs the entire MMA ecosystem because the UFC has the ability to lockdown a big segment of Pro MMA fighters. Thus, other promotions cannot secure Pro MMA fighters for big events and thus it cannot pay fighters like the UFC.

Davis lawsuit seeks specific injunctive relief which would limit exclusionary and restrictive contracts, eliminate arbitration clauses and class action waivers.

In addition, Davis lawsuit implicates TKO in the alleged scheme citing a Mark Shapiro interview with Pat McAfee as well as its presentations where it touts UFC as an important part of its “flywheel.”

Payout Perspective:

Davis’ specific request for injunctive relief presses the current standard in MMA contracts which are restrictive and exclusionary. Davis argues that the contracts eliminate the possibility of competition since fighters are not able to fight elsewhere for comparable pay. Notably, Gegard Mousasi’s lawsuit argues that Bellator “warehoused” him so they didn’t have to pay him his exorbitant pay. There’s the obvious test for this lawsuit if it will pass a Motion to Dismiss. If so, it will be an interesting landscape that TKO and Zuffa will have to defend.

Filed Under: Featured, Le v. Zuffa, legal, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Plaintiffs file Answering Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Appeal

Jai Opetaia files a lawsuit against IBF

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Does Conor McGregor still have the aura?

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Available in three flavours: Fudgey Chocolate Al, Sweet Frank Mir Strawberry and Milky Ultimate Fighter Sushi N' Cream

UFC protein bars

😳

Barstool Sports @barstoolsports

Air Force Bron: LeBron is apparently going to live In NYC and commute to Philly everyday by helicopter

#WWE and Sirius XM team up for 24/7 https://mmapayout.com/2026/07/27/wwe-and-sirius-xm-team-up-for-24-7/

RT @JRodFanClub: We got people blaming Seattle’s gun laws and defunding the police for a targeted gang shooting, when there were cops every…

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports