• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Jury rules in favor of Paradigm in Pacquiao lawsuit

May 4, 2023 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

A jury in Orange County Superior Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of Paradigm Sports Management, LLC in a breach of contract lawsuit against Manny Pacquiao.

Manny Pacquiao left, and Audie Attar Founder, Chairman and CEO of Paradigm Sports Management (via press release)

The jury ruled in favor of Paradigm Sports 9-3, to award $5.1 million which broken down is $3.3 million in actual damages and $1.8 million in punitive damages.  According to Sportico, the verdict also includes the right for Paradigm to collect 10% annual interest on the amount dating back three years and attorneys’ fees for a total amount of approximately $8 million.

Of course, despite the jury award, the dispute is not over as Pacquiao’s attorneys state that a Motion for Nonsuit is pending before the Court and will be heard in June.  This apparently stems from trial testimony in which Audie Attar stated that he did not have a combat sports manager license in California although he was attempting to sign Pacquiao. 

The Ronda Rousey-Darin Harvey case was a similar case in which the California State Athletic Commission ruled in favor of the former UFC champion.  The reason being was that Harvey did not utilize the correct CSAC managerial form nor was it executed in front of CSAC officials.  As a result, at the administrative hearing, the commission ruled in favor of Rousey.

While the facts are similar, but not the same, Paradigm attorneys claim that this is a case of first impression. 

Pacquiao’s lawyers state that there is Motion for Nonsuit pending which is basically a motion that says based on the evidence presented by the plaintiff cannot prove its case.  Notably, the motion was used in trial already by both parties and the Court denied both motions.  Whether or not this is an indicator of what the Court may do at the June hearing is unknown. 

But, if the Court sides with Pacquiao, the verdict will be overturned and will likely set off an appeal.  Of course, if the verdict remains in tact then Pacquiao’s attorney would bring a motion to set aside the verdict, reduce the damages or appeal. 

MPO will have more on this.

Filed Under: Featured, legal, Pacquiao

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Conor McGregor returns July 11th

Keane’s attorneys fire back at Top Rank based on undiscovered evidence

White writes letter to Trump requesting change to law

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Mixed Martial Arts Pioneer Scott Coker Plans 2027 Launch of New Global MMA League With $60M in Financing, Including From Tony Hawk

This was old school NBA playoffs

CHGO Bulls @CHGO_Bulls

32 years ago today...

Scottie Pippen destroyed Patrick Ewing

😱😱😱😱

Ken Griffey, Jr

HAWK @HawkEmDownChris

Age yourself by naming an MLB center fielder you grew up watching.

I’ll start: Mike Trout.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports