• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Kambosos sued by former manager

October 25, 2022 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Boxing manager Peter Kahn has filed a lawsuit against his former fighter George Kambosos for unpaid money due to him per an oral agreement between the two.  The payouts dispute money earned from Kambosos two fights against Devin Haney. 

Kahn filed the lawsuit on October 13th in Broward County, Florida.  Khan is seeking actual damages of unpaid work he agreed to do for Kambosos.  Specifically, the negotiation of the first fight with Devin Haney and the rematch which took place just two days after the lawsuit was filed. 

In a letter attached to the lawsuit, Kambosos fired Kahn on October 3rd.  Kahn responded with a request that he be paid the balance from both the first Haney fight and the rematch. 

Exhibit from Kahn lawsuit
Exhibit from Kahn lawsuit

A text message from Kambosos to Kahn stated that the fighter wanted the second fight after losing to Haney.  

Exhibit from Kahn lawsuit

Kahn is suing for Breach of Contract claiming that Kambosos did not provide him the proper managerial payout of the work he did to secure the Haney fights.  

Kahn indicates in the lawsuit that he had an oral agreement with Kambosos in which the fighter would pay Kahn 10% of his earnings.  However, Kahn states that Kambosos underpaid him for the first Haney fight.  The lawsuit states that Kambosos paid Kahn $300,000 for the fight which was $88,000 less than the agreed upon ten percent.  

Despite the discrepancy, Kahn continued to work as Kambosos manager.  But, after the second fight was secured with Haney, Kambosos sent a letter firing Kahn just days short of his rematch.  Kahn acknowledged the termination but also asked about the underpayment and his pay for the second fight. 

Per the lawsuit, Kambosos received a purse of $4M USD as well as a percentage of the ticket revenue and share of the Australian PPV.  For the second fight, he received a guarantee of $2M USD plus an upside of 37.5% of the Australian Revenue in excess of $2.5M USD.  Both fights took place in Australia. 

Kambosos has yet to respond to the lawsuit.

Payout Perspective:

Oral contracts are valid but it’s clear this one will be problematic considering it deals with percentages of a fighter’s purse.  Also, one would believe that an oral contract between boxer and manager may be frowned upon by commissions and regulators.  Certainly, Kahn should be paid for his work.  But, one can surmise that Kambosos has a different story on the arrangement.  MPO will continue to follow.

Filed Under: boxing, contracts, legal, The Legal Submission

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Wolfe downgrades TKO after strong rally

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

For the first time, here's a link to "Private Equity in College Sports," written by @SunealBedi, John Holden and myself, and forthcoming in Volume 111 of @MinnesotaLawRev:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6349318

Failed MMA fighter, but successful plumber and drafter of a cut and paste version of the mUhammAD aLi act takes over of Homeland Security

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Kristi, you’re fired!

(Yes, I had this ready)

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports