• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

White goes after Las Vegas Review Journal

April 25, 2021 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Angry with a fight day article about UFC 261 taking place before a capacity crowd in an arena for the first time since the pandemic started, Dana White laid into the hometown Las Vegas Review Journal and told them not to come to the company’s big UFC event in July.

He directed his social media post to Las Vegas citizens stating, “this is our piece of shit local newspaper” claiming that the treatment of the company was not fair.  The lead, by Adam Hill’s piece started, “At least 15,000 people are willing to risk permanent damage or death to attend a live sporting event again.” 

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Dana White (@danawhite)

The piece, went on to read, “That’s according to language in the disclaimer for those attending UFC 261 in Jacksonville, Florida…”

He claimed in the post-fight press conference that there are editors at the paper that like to sensationalize things.

The rest of the article did not state anything mischaracterizing the event and in fact promoted Saturday’s event.  Yet, White took issue with the framing of the article because of the COVID-19 issue.

Payout Perspective:

Frankly, I would have never known about this article until White posted this rant on social media.  White’s public tantrum about the article reflects his concern about the event and while the LVRJ is fear-mongering, if he was fine with going through with UFC 261 with fans why does it matter to him. If White was confident that people would not be hurt, why exactly did he go ahead with the disclaimer language on tickets?  The lead was nothing more than information that fans would have known if they read the disclaimer language.  But, just like the Journal’s article, fans wouldn’t have known about it, had he not pointed it out. The point here is that he blasted the Journal to apply public pressure from his fanbase of followers to evoke some change he could do without having to do it.  Similar to President Trump’s rants on twitter before he was banned, there’s a purpose to point out something that bothered them.  And that’s to rattle the base to do something about it. 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Injunction filed against Mayweather from fighting this Saturday

The UFC’s undying loyalty to Trump

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit claim White’s devices “wiped” intentionally

Alex Periera accused of sexual assault, coercive sexual encounters, stalking

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Special shout out to the reporters (or those interested in the case) for having the temerity to cover both sides.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

I hate that we live in such a digital panopticon where people can just record you and post you to the worldwide web and get you fired at a whim. That being said, how are you an executive at JPMorgan and dumping trash on the ground to steal a public trash can?

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

After a 2-hour hearing on CSI's request for an injunction preventing Saturday's Mayweather-Zambidis exhibition -- which I listed to every minute of -- the judge asked for some additional questions that the lawyers need to check on. No ruling today. Lawyers need all their

Austin Reaves getting the max? Who knew?

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Ten years ago Dana and the UFC were heavily pushing pride themed shirts all through June.

3

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports