• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Mark Hunt files Notice of Appeal in his lawsuit against UFC, White and Lesnar

March 25, 2019 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Mark Hunt has filed a Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit for a potential reversal of the District Court’s decision to decision 9 out of 10 of his claims in his lawsuit filed against the UFC, Dana White and Brock Lesnar.

Plaintiffs are seeking the overturn of the Court’s decision handed out on February 22nd in which U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey dismissed 9 out of 10 claims brought by the UFC Heavyweight.  Among the claims, he brought allegations under the Civil RICO Act arguing that the UFC had conspired to allow fighters that use banned substances to compete in the UFC.  It also claimed that Brock Lesnar was guilty of battery as Hunt did not assume the risk of fighting an opponent on a banned substance.

The Court dismissed the claims citing no conspiracy and that Hunt had conceded to the involvement in the fight with Lesnar despite the failed drug test by the WWE performer.  The Court indicated that there was nothing out of the norm of ordinary activity in an MMA bout.

Payout Perspective:

While I believed that this fight in the courts would end in a win for the UFC, the Plaintiffs have appealed the decision which will cause a longer process for resolution.  Yet, if you are to look at this case from a legal precedent perspective, there seems to be an argument to be made with Hunt’s assumption of the risk in this case.  MMA Payout will keep you posted.

Filed Under: Hunt v. Zuffa, legal, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Lawsuit seeks to shutdown UFC White House event

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

From the Judge's Order today denying the injunction. The Court states that plaintiffs did not have a specific harm to satisfy the threshold for an injunction #UFCWhiteHouse #TKO #UFC

Judge Amit Mehta, the judge that denied the #UFC White House injunction, was a Obama appointee. Just another reason to Blame Obama

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Only 16% of Americans approve of Trump holding UFC event at White House.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ALERT: Judge Amit Metha rules UFC event can proceed at White House, ruling harm to plaintiffs would only be "temporary" & that the challenge came too late

"Considerable time, labor & funding.. has gone into organizing the UFC fight and lead-up events"

Full contact 5 days a week 😂

MMA Mania @mmamania

Mania Mailbag: Do we trane UFC? https://www.mmamania.com/mma-mailbag-questions-answers-ufc/449583/mania-mailbag-do-we-trane-ufc?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports