• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

DAZN institutes new pay structure including annual fee

March 21, 2019 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

DAZN announced that starting next week it will debut a new annual pass option of $99.99 per year.  In the alternative, it will allow new subscribers to pay $19.99 per month.

DAZN is granting those that began with the $9.99 per month option to pay over the next year.  The new $19.99 per month option allows for a subscriber to cancel at any time.

The digital platform began this past September in the United States.  Since then it has featured Bellator events as well as boxing events.  The big news came when Canelo Alvarez signed on with the streaming site for a then-record 5-year, 11 fight deal worth $365 million.  It then signed GGG earlier this month to a three-year, six-fight deal which was reported in the nine-figure range although not disclosed.

It also made a run at heavyweight champion Deontay Wilder who had a $100 million offer on the table but the Alabama native turned it down to sign a pact with Showtime Boxing for his next fight.

Payout Perspective:

The new payment structure is good and bad.  The overarching reason for the change is to grow the subscriber base.  If you take advantage of the annual fee, you realize a 20% decrease over the year.  For boxing fans this is a good deal to pay $100 per year for good cards each month.  For MMA fans, the new pay structure will make you consider the need for the digital platform as Bellator has just a handful of exclusive cards on DAZN.  But, the $19.99 per month essentially accounts for combat sports fans that want to see a specific event but does not want to pay for the year.  With the GGG and Canelo fighting in the next couple months, the raise in subscription price ensures that the company maintains revenue without losing too much without charging a PPV.

Filed Under: boxing, DAZN

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Lawsuit seeks to shutdown UFC White House event

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

From the Judge's Order today denying the injunction. The Court states that plaintiffs did not have a specific harm to satisfy the threshold for an injunction #UFCWhiteHouse #TKO #UFC

Judge Amit Mehta, the judge that denied the #UFC White House injunction, was a Obama appointee. Just another reason to Blame Obama

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Only 16% of Americans approve of Trump holding UFC event at White House.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ALERT: Judge Amit Metha rules UFC event can proceed at White House, ruling harm to plaintiffs would only be "temporary" & that the challenge came too late

"Considerable time, labor & funding.. has gone into organizing the UFC fight and lead-up events"

Full contact 5 days a week 😂

MMA Mania @mmamania

Mania Mailbag: Do we trane UFC? https://www.mmamania.com/mma-mailbag-questions-answers-ufc/449583/mania-mailbag-do-we-trane-ufc?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports