• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Jon Jones cleared to fight at UFC 235 in March

January 30, 2019 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

On Tuesday, the Nevada Athletic Commission granted Jon Jones a one-fight license to compete on March 2nd against Anthony Smith at UFC 235.

Jones, who appeared in person at the meeting, will be required to be drug tested a minimum of twice a month until he fights in March.  He will then need to continue testing throughout all of 2019 if he seeks to fight in the state again.

Unlike the California State Athletic Commission, who was willing to pay for the costs of the additional testing for Jones, Nevada is making Jones pay for the testing.

Jones was represented by Maine drug doping attorney Paul Greene.  In prior doping hearings, Jones had been represented by Howard Jacobs.  The hearing included testimony from USADA which led to the commission opining if more should be done with the UFC Anti-Doping Policy.

The commission made it known that this was not a “get out of jail free” card.  Yet, there was still no resolution of the pathology of the drug.  Green indicated that the substance remains in Jones’ system and while further testing may reveal turinabol but additional banned contents in Jones’ tests may result in the end of his MMA career.

Payout Perspective:

This is perhaps an anticlimactic end to the Jones’ controversy.  One has to wonder at some point why Turinabol remains in his system and why it remains in his system.  Jones has cut down his supplements from 14 to 4.  The remaining 4 are certified according to Green.  The one-fight license seems to just punt away the issue until another date.  The enhanced drug testing does not seem to determine the real issue since they are just getting the result, but not the origin of the turinabol seems to be the answer they need.  We will see how the commission deals with this in the future.

Filed Under: Drug Testing, UFC, USADA

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports