• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Bantamweight accepts one-year sanction from USADA for banned diuretic

February 5, 2018 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Carls John de Tomas has accepted a one-year sanction for testing positive for a diuretic prohibited by the UFC anti-doping policy.

The Filipino fighter tested positive for furosemide on December 8, 2017 before his bout at the UFC Fight Night event in Fresno, California.

Via USADA:

Furosemide is a Specified Substance in the class of Diuretics and Masking Agents and prohibited at all times under the UFC Anti-Doping Policy, which has adopted the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List.

De Tomas’ one-year period of ineligibility began on December 29, 2017, the date his provisional suspension was imposed. The athlete’s positive test also falls under the jurisdiction of the California State Athletic Commission, which has also sanctioned De Tomas with a one-year suspension and a $2,500 fine.

Pursuant to the UFC Anti-Doping Policy, all UFC athletes serving a period of ineligibility for an anti-doping policy violation are required to continue to make themselves available for testing in order to receive credit for time completed under their sanction.

The 21-year-old lost to Alex Perez at UFC Fight Night 123 on December 9th.

Payout Perspective:

It was just the second fight for De Tomas in the UFC which may be another reason to wonder if fighters just starting in the UFC are more susceptible to failing a drug tests due to lack of knowledge or education of the UFC anti-doping policy.  De Tomas was also fined $2,500 by the California State Athletic Commission which is harsh for a fighter that just made $10,000 from his loss.

Filed Under: Drug Testing, Flagged by USADA, UFC, USADA

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/11/ufc-freedom-250-kits-revealed/

Unpopular opinion: Kevin Harlan just yells #NBA #Lakers #FOKC

Marcus Smart with a play #Lakers

The guy sold the team to OKC claiming they’d build something in Seattle

Wall Street Journal Opinion @WSJopinion

Seattle turns hostile to the great businesses it made. Starbucks is moving jobs from Washington state to Tennessee, and it isn’t alone in looking elsewhere, writes @HowardSchultz
https://on.wsj.com/4uCiVCD

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

How did Loeffler/360 Promotions rebuild interest in Bohachuk after he lost to Adams the first time?
Why does any promoter, if they still have the rights to the fighter, continue their agreement after a loss?
An attorney and former boxing manager's thoughts (archived):

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports