• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Bantamweight accepts one-year sanction from USADA for banned diuretic

February 5, 2018 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

Carls John de Tomas has accepted a one-year sanction for testing positive for a diuretic prohibited by the UFC anti-doping policy.

The Filipino fighter tested positive for furosemide on December 8, 2017 before his bout at the UFC Fight Night event in Fresno, California.

Via USADA:

Furosemide is a Specified Substance in the class of Diuretics and Masking Agents and prohibited at all times under the UFC Anti-Doping Policy, which has adopted the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List.

De Tomas’ one-year period of ineligibility began on December 29, 2017, the date his provisional suspension was imposed. The athlete’s positive test also falls under the jurisdiction of the California State Athletic Commission, which has also sanctioned De Tomas with a one-year suspension and a $2,500 fine.

Pursuant to the UFC Anti-Doping Policy, all UFC athletes serving a period of ineligibility for an anti-doping policy violation are required to continue to make themselves available for testing in order to receive credit for time completed under their sanction.

The 21-year-old lost to Alex Perez at UFC Fight Night 123 on December 9th.

Payout Perspective:

It was just the second fight for De Tomas in the UFC which may be another reason to wonder if fighters just starting in the UFC are more susceptible to failing a drug tests due to lack of knowledge or education of the UFC anti-doping policy.  De Tomas was also fined $2,500 by the California State Athletic Commission which is harsh for a fighter that just made $10,000 from his loss.

Filed Under: Drug Testing, Flagged by USADA, UFC, USADA

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Plaintiffs file Answering Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Appeal

Jai Opetaia files a lawsuit against IBF

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

WWE merger lawsuit settlement details disclosed in 10-Q:

"WWE's portion of the overall settlement amount is $105.0 million, which is expected to be funded by probable insurance recoveries of $75M, resulting in an expected loss of $30M"

TKO beats analyst expectations with busy Q2 period

So you are saying its a 2-for-1

boosie badazz pardon approval team @scrohto

Poop has been traded for INF prospect Pee

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

TKO Group Holdings released their Q2 results. UFC revenue up $120 million compared to Q2 last year. https://investor.tkogrp.com/news/news-details/2026/TKO-Reports-Second-Quarter-2026-Results/default.aspx

#Mayweather argues that CSI has not established that "alleged difficulty collecting a possible unsecured contract judgment is a legally cognizable basis for the prelim injunction it seeks."

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports