• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

PFA head calls for “live debate” to discuss merits of fighter organizing

April 4, 2017 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

Despite a deadline to garner enough signatures to go forward with a union for UFC fighters, MLB agent Jeff Borris and his organization, Professional Fighters Association, is seeking to debate competing entities over the right to represent athletes according to the Sports Business Journal.

Borris’ PFA has fallen off from the momentum it seemingly had when it the formation was announced this past summer.  Borris made media rounds and appeared accessible to anyone that wanted more information on the organization.

But since this summer, he lost the support off labor lawyer Lucas Middlebrook and UFC Fighter Leslie Smith.  The split may have been due to the release of names of a possible board of fighters that appeared in an MMA Junkie article.  According to Smith, the names were supposed to be confidential.  Borris denied releasing the information.

Borris had given a deadline of early April to obtain information or he would cease operations.

Borris is requesting a live debate as he believes it “would benefit the fighters so they can make an informed selection of who they want leading this movement.”

MMAAA’s advisor Bjorn Rebney or MMAFA’s Robert Maysey indicated that they were not interested in debating Borris.

Payout Perspective:

It is interesting to note that these tactics attempted by Borris is not working out.  The “live debate” concept seems like a last-ditch effort to garner some media attention.  However, it only seems like a sideshow that would denigrate the efforts made by others to organize fighters for better working conditions.  While Borris may have some good ideas, he seems to be thought of as an “outsider” to the MMA community.  This might be a good thing, but most seem to have more trust in Rebney or Maysey’s organization than with PFA.

Filed Under: MMAAA, MMAFA, PFA

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. d says

    April 4, 2017 at 7:27 pm

    Borris was buried a while ago and this ridiculous idea that a union would work in the UFC with him. What’s funny is how arrogant he was at first assuming every fighter would greet him with open arms in the UFC and clearly they realized he did not have their best interests in mind.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/11/ufc-freedom-250-kits-revealed/

Unpopular opinion: Kevin Harlan just yells #NBA #Lakers #FOKC

Marcus Smart with a play #Lakers

The guy sold the team to OKC claiming they’d build something in Seattle

Wall Street Journal Opinion @WSJopinion

Seattle turns hostile to the great businesses it made. Starbucks is moving jobs from Washington state to Tennessee, and it isn’t alone in looking elsewhere, writes @HowardSchultz
https://on.wsj.com/4uCiVCD

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

How did Loeffler/360 Promotions rebuild interest in Bohachuk after he lost to Adams the first time?
Why does any promoter, if they still have the rights to the fighter, continue their agreement after a loss?
An attorney and former boxing manager's thoughts (archived):

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports