• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

UFC 203 PPV buys estimated between 425K-475K

September 19, 2016 by Jason Cruz 7 Comments

MMA Fighting reports that UFC 203 early projections have it between 425,000-475,000 PPV buys.  The numbers would make it the best UFC PPV not featuring Conor McGregor or UFC 200 which brings up the question of whether the CM Punk experiment helped boost the buy rate.

The event’s main event featured Stipe Miocic defending his UFC heavyweight title in his hometown against Alistair Overeem.  But most people were intrigued by CM Punk’s debut against Mickey Gall.

Dave Meltzer of MMA Fighting opined that Punk probably brought in an additional 125,000-225,000 extra buys or between $3.75 million and $6.75 million.  This estimate is based on UFC 198’s PPV buy rate which registered slightly under 300,000 PPV buys.

Maybe not a good comparison, but UFC 118 which featured James Toney taking on Randy Couture drew 535,000 PPV buys.  Of course, that event featured Penn-Edgar II at a time that The Prodigy was still a very popular fighter.

Payout Perspective:

One must conclude that the uniqueness of CM Punk’s debut attributed to the buy rate.  While Miocic-Overeem is a good match-up for most hardcore MMA fans, the casual viewer was likely intrigued by the Punk debut.  Does this mean Punk should come back or was this just a one-hit wonder?  We now know Punk’s skills and I would suggest that most casual fans would now pass on Punk’s second fight.  But, the Punk experiment does seem to have paid off for the UFC.

Filed Under: Featured, pay-per-view, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. MMA Numbers says

    September 19, 2016 at 4:06 pm

    The concept and pattern of “The UFC borrowing star power from the WWE” will quickly grow old on sports fans. The broader sports media will call out the UFC (if this occurs more and more) by using words such as “promotional gimmick”.
    Look what’s going on right now with the New York Mets selling Tim Tebow jerseys for $120.
    The effectiveness of bringing in a WWE star for a UFC pay-per-view will quickly erode…

    Reply
  2. tops E says

    September 19, 2016 at 7:38 pm

    Connor is bigger than ufc brand

    Reply
  3. ETOPS says

    September 20, 2016 at 2:57 am

    Brock Lesnar was a former UFC champion and is currently a part time WWE wrestler from what I’ve understand. CM Punk left the wrestling business over 2 years ago, to say they using WWE stars as a pattern is stretching it.

    Ronda is more popular than Conor, she just fight less than him.

    Reply
  4. Fight Fan says

    September 20, 2016 at 6:21 am

    This is the only way they can sell ppvs now by bringing in a gimmick. We’ll see what happens with the next few ppvs

    Reply
  5. MMA Numbers says

    September 20, 2016 at 9:18 am

    Brock Lesnar and CM Punk were pay-per-view stars for the WWE before they went to UFC.
    “Gimmick” was even being used ahead of UFC 200 in regards to Lesnar (since he hadn’t fought in five years and Dana White had to borrow him from Vince McMahon).
    Lesnar tried out for the Minnesota Vikings in 2004. And ESPN gave it attention because he was a WWE star.
    ESPN gave attention to CM Punk’s loss at UFC 203 because he was a WWE star.
    I used the words “if” and “more and more”.
    If it occurs more, sports fans will roll their eyes and the broader sports media will quickly dismiss it as a “gimmick”.

    Reply
  6. xfcvxzvxcvxcv says

    September 26, 2016 at 8:28 pm

    Official ESPN:

    Conor v Eddie for the 55 title at UFC 205 [ Conor won’t have to give up 45 title either]

    Woodley vs Wonderboy co Main

    Reply
  7. Combo says

    September 29, 2016 at 12:13 pm

    UFC has been the combat sports PPV king even without WWE stars or novelties.
    Which reminds me, UFC MSG will be awesome.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports