• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

USADA clears bantamweight after positive drug test

August 9, 2016 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

UFC bantamweight Ning Guangyou did not receive a sanction for a positive drug test.  Guangyou tested positive for trace amounts of clenbuterol but USADA deemed that he ingested it without fault or negligence.

According to the USADA report, the positive test is a result of an out-of-competition test back in May.  Clenbuterol was found in his sample.  It is an anabolic agent prohibited at all times under the UFC Anti-Doping Policy.  However, as the report states, “the illicit administration of clenbuterol to animals destined for food production can result in, under specific conditions, a positive sample from an athlete.”

After review of Guangyou’s whereabouts, dietary habits and the lab reports, it was deemed that it was likely that he consumed contaminated meat in China.

The UFC issued a statement on its web site, a portion of it reads:

In late July, UFC was made aware of USADA’s investigation into the source of the prohibited substance clenbuterol in an out of competition sample collected from Ning Guangyou. Given it was initially unclear as to the timing of the resolution of the investigation, UFC made the decision to move Guangyou’s scheduled bout against Marlon Vera on August 20, 2016 at UFC 202 to UFC Fight Night: Maia vs. Condit in Vancouver, BC on August 27, 2016.

Payout Perspective:

The good news is that this case was determined ahead of Guangyou’s fight so he did not lose out on a payday when there was a possibility that he may not be at fault.  The investigation shows that USADA is making an effort to ensure that positive tests reflect infractions rather than no-fault positive tests.  We have seen this with the finding of Meldonium in tests from UFC fighters.  From a business perspective, the investigations as well as the increase in tests this year will mean more investment into the UFC Anti-Doping policy.

Filed Under: Drug Testing, UFC, USADA

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports