• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

UFC issues statement after Silva hearing

August 14, 2015 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

The UFC issued a statement on Thursday’s Anderson Silva hearing before the Nevada State Athletic Commission.

Via UFC.com:

Following the Nevada Athletic Commission’s hearing today, Anderson Silva is required to serve a 12-month suspension from competition, retroactive from his last fight on January 31. At the conclusion of his suspension, Silva must present a clean test upon reapplication of a license before his next fight in Nevada. The UFC organization maintains a strict, consistent policy against the use of any illegal and/or performance enhancing drugs, stimulants or masking agents by its athletes, and fully supports the Commission’s ongoing efforts to ensure clean competition by all MMA athletes.

UFC recognizes Silva’s great career and looks forward to his return to the Octagon in 2016.

Payout Perspective:

A rather innocuous response to a poor showing before the commission by what many believe is the greatest fighter of all time.  The commission chastised Silva for his “soft testimony” implying that he was not telling truth under oath.  The statement provided by the UFC indicates that he is expected to return despite turning 40.  Despite Thursday’s hearing, Silva is still revered by most in Brazil and the UFC still would like him as an ambassador for the sport after his fighting days are over.

Filed Under: UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. mmaguru says

    August 14, 2015 at 7:28 pm

    As a long time MMA fan, I have little interest in seeing Silva fight in the UFC anymore. His last three fights demonstrated that he is no longer competitive in the UFC. Maybe he would be better off going to Bellator where he would find some form of fights where his name recognition with serve him well.

    Reply
  2. Diego says

    August 18, 2015 at 3:53 am

    I agree with mmaguru. This feels like when Royce tested positive after trying to fight long after his expiration date. I’m good calling quits on a great career.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Lawsuit seeks to shutdown UFC White House event

Johnson plaintiffs take a renewed aim at Dominance in antitrust lawsuit

Scott Coker returns to MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

From the Judge's Order today denying the injunction. The Court states that plaintiffs did not have a specific harm to satisfy the threshold for an injunction #UFCWhiteHouse #TKO #UFC

Judge Amit Mehta, the judge that denied the #UFC White House injunction, was a Obama appointee. Just another reason to Blame Obama

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Only 16% of Americans approve of Trump holding UFC event at White House.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ALERT: Judge Amit Metha rules UFC event can proceed at White House, ruling harm to plaintiffs would only be "temporary" & that the challenge came too late

"Considerable time, labor & funding.. has gone into organizing the UFC fight and lead-up events"

Full contact 5 days a week 😂

MMA Mania @mmamania

Mania Mailbag: Do we trane UFC? https://www.mmamania.com/mma-mailbag-questions-answers-ufc/449583/mania-mailbag-do-we-trane-ufc?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports