• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Sonnen readies for Metamoris, no clarification from NSAC

August 7, 2014 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

Despite threats from the Nevada State Athletic Commission, it appears that Chael Sonnen will participate at this Saturday’s Metamoris event in Los Angeles.  Sonnnen’s legal representatives believe that he has a case that the NSAC penalty assessed in July does not apply to this event.

According to MMA Junkie, Sonnen’s lawyer in this matter has contacted the commission twice seeking clarification yet it appears that it has yet to respond to the inquiry.  It was the commission that warned Sonnen about violating the terms of his year suspension by participating in the grappling event on Saturday.  Notably, the NSAC did not question Sonnen about the event even though he was before the commission to receive his punishment in July.

Sonnen’s lawyer argues that the NSAC has “no jurisdiction” over the grappling event.  Essentially, Metamoris is not regulated because it does not fall within the ambit of “unarmed combat” per the Nevada rules.

Payout Perspective:

It will be interesting to see what, if anything, the NSAC does when Sonnen participates.  If the NSAC levies a fine, it would not be surprising to see Sonnen fight it considering the strong arguments made by Sonnen’s attorney.  The lack of clarification from the NSAC to Sonnen’s lawyer infers that it is not wholly clear on whether Sonnen is violating his suspension.

Filed Under: Metamoris, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. FightBusiness says

    August 8, 2014 at 7:06 am

    Although sonnen is a sorry sack of lying shit, I dont think the Nevada commission should be able to stop him from partcipating in a grappling competition in California

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court

Plaintiffs highlight outstanding discovery in Johnson antitrust case

UFC 329 Payout Perspective

Does Conor McGregor still have the aura?

Court Memo and Order from CSI Entertainment-Mayweather TRO hearing

TKO responds to allegations of missing discovery in Johnson case

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The us number for the McGregor show was 6.1. Milllion. White House show was 7 million. Rousey fight was just over 9. But Netflix has a big advantage in homes.

Want to be an NIL attorney representing athletes? You don't get paid...really.

CSI Entertainment attorneys claim that Stephen Espinoza's declaration in support of Floyd #Mayweather is a #quidproquo as the boxer is suing Espinoza and #Showtime #Boxing

MMA Payout @MMAPayout

Parties in Mayweather-CSI Entertainment lawsuit provide joint letter to court #boxing #Mayweather #sportslaw https://mmapayout.com/2026/07/20/parties-in-mayweather-csi-entertainment-lawsuit-provide-joint-letter-to-court/

First Texas, now Florida allows #UFC license plates

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

No one wants this

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports