• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Strikeforce Challengers 8: Payouts and Ratings

May 26, 2010 by Kelsey Philpott 3 Comments

Strikeforce held a Challengers Series show in Portland, Oregon over the weekend that featured some pretty good prospect talent in the likes of Tyron Woodley, Roger Bowling, and Tarec Saffiedine. The event managed to draw 249,000 average viewers on Showtime, which isn’t that far off what last weeks heavily promoted Strikeforce: Heavy Artillery card.

MMAJunkie, also provided the payouts for the event:

Matt Lindland: $1,000 (no win bonus)
def. Kevin Casey: $10,000

Tyron Woodley: $9,000 (includes $4,500 win bonus)
def. Nate Coy: $3,000

Roger Bowling: $6,000 (includes $3,000 win bonus)
def. Bobby Voelker: $3,500

Tarec Saffiedine: $8,000 (includes $4,000 win bonus)
def. Nate Moore: $4,000

Pat Healy: $6,000 (includes $3,000 win bonus)
def Bryan Travers: $3,000

Pro Escobedo: $2,000 (includes $1,000 win bonus)
def. Jason Sharp: $1,000

Payout Perspective:

The organization has drawn anywhere from 100,000 to  315,000 with these Challengers cards in the past, but the high end of that scale came as the result of a free preview that significantly expanded Showtime beyond its 18 million subscribers. The average draw for these Challengers events seems to be a little below 200,000, which suggests that the Heavy Artillery card, while maligned for itself being average,  actually boosted the short-term interest in Strikeforce to benefit this Challengers’ card.

This really speaks to the need for Strikeforce to develop a consistent media and communications strategy. If the brand is going to grow, the organization must be in constant contact with the fans and media to produce content every week – these intermittent flurries of information every couple weeks just won’t cut it.

—–

Matt Lindland was not paid $1,000 for his fight with Casey. He’s a local product and undoubtedly received bonuses for his participation in the event (perhaps even related to the gate itself and how much business he was able to bring the event).

Filed Under: payouts, ratings, Strikeforce

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jose Mendoza says

    May 27, 2010 at 2:03 am

    Pretty interesting to note:

    SF Challengers 8:
    Avg Viewers: 250K
    Peak Viewers: 300K (Lindland vs Casey)

    SF Heavy Artillery:
    Avg Viewers: 310K
    Peak Viewers: 448K (Overeem vs Rogers)

    Reply
  2. Diego says

    May 27, 2010 at 9:52 am

    I agree that it may have something to do with staying in the fans’ minds. Coming right after Heavy Artillery helped a Challengers card that if it had come a few weeks later may have been lost in the shuffle. Just look at the ratings growth of the Bellator series. By putting on a show week after week they are able to increase their momentum as the weeks go on even though any given card isn’t necessarily stacked.

    If you are on a cable channel (not PPV) and you have 20 good fights, it seems that it’s better to put on 5 fights each week for a month rather than all 20 in one night. It’s different for PPV where you need to stack cards (or have a very strong main event) in order to get fans to pay.

    I wonder if there was a boost in the live attendance as well.

    I can’t help thinking of Dream and their sporadic marathon 5 hour shows with 12+ fights. They might improve their ratings if they split up some of those cards and put on shows more consistently. But then Japan is a “unique” market.

    Reply
  3. Stan Kosek says

    May 27, 2010 at 6:55 pm

    good to see it did OK, I’m sure HA the week before helped it out, but that’s exactly the type of synergy SF needs… too bad that Lashley is off their first June card, will probably lose some casual viewers to pimp Fedor/Werdum to.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports