• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Early returns show GGG-Jacobs PPV draw between 130-150K PPV buys

March 21, 2017 by Jason Cruz 5 Comments

Lance Pugmire of the LA Times reports that the early returns on the GGG-Jacobs PPV is between 130,000 to 150,000 buys although the GGG camp says that the final tally will be higher than 150,000.

Pugmire cites an industry source for the report as HBO has yet to provide an official tally.  Notably, the last GGG PPV,  GGG-Lemieux in October 2015 drew 150,000 PPV buys.

Early pay per view report shows @GGGBoxing @DanielJacobsTKO fight had buys ranging from 130k to 150k, according to industry source…

— Lance Pugmire (@latimespugmire) March 21, 2017

Pugmire notes that the gate for last Saturday’s event was $3.7 million as compared to $2 million for GGG-Lemieux.

Payout Perspective:

Even if the fight draws over 150,000 PPV buys, it likely won’t go much higher than that.  The PPV buy rate is not favorable for GGG as he possibly seeks a big fight against Canelo Alvarez in September.  The event went up against the NCAA Tournament but it was big fight and Jacobs was a much more marketable name than David Lemieux.

Filed Under: boxing, HBO, pay-per-view

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Thompson says

    March 21, 2017 at 3:33 pm

    Good numbers.

    Reply
  2. Joey Vagas says

    March 21, 2017 at 3:36 pm

    GGG needs a bigger name next time. An aging A#1 lister. I am barley starting to look his way and he might be gone before I turn around just to see what I am looking at the way Jacobs was able to take him apart those few rounds. Speed and movement gives him trouble where do you find that? Jacobs was close. I hope he gets another big opportunity. There’s some real muscle around now let’s see what GGG can do. He looked real beatable. But he come to fight for sure. He just fights a little too Gangley for me. But yea I’ll watch him.

    Reply
  3. Diego says

    March 22, 2017 at 4:44 am

    I had Danny Jacobs winning but I don’t think the decision was a robbery. It may help GGG in the end exactly because he looked beatable. He always had a hard time finding quality opponents, but now maybe a few will think they have a chance. Jacobs essentially took the Brook playbook and implemented it with his bigger size. Others may believe they can have more success.

    Reply
  4. Wil says

    March 22, 2017 at 11:29 pm

    I had GGG winning 114-113, exactly what one of the judges had….clearly not a robbery, nor was GGG “exposed”…..he was simply in there with one of the best middleweights in the world and the best opponent he has had yet. Jacobs might beat him the next time around….

    Reply
  5. Wil says

    March 22, 2017 at 11:33 pm

    By the way, GGG needs to be pulling 300K minimum each time out…this could be done with the proper promotion, GGG is a potential superstar if they would just put him out there more, not sure K2 has the juice to make that happen.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports