• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

NAC passes settlement agreement with Nick Diaz

January 12, 2016 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Nevada State Athletic Commission passed a proposed settlement agreement with UFC contracted fighter Nick Diaz at the commission’s monthly hearing on Tuesday.

Pat Lundvall, who was the main driver during the contentious Nick Diaz hearing, seconded the motion for the passage of the proposed settlement.  The settlement was passed without any discussion or public announcement as to the terms.  MMA Junkie obtained the settlement agreement after speaking with NSAC Chairman Bob Bennett.

The Settlement Agreement obtained by MMA Junkie indicates that Diaz’s initial penalty was reduced to 18 months (retroactive to his last fight January 31, 2015) and a $100,000 fine.  He will need to pay the fine by August 1, 2016 (the date in which he may be allowed to fight in Nevada) or at least December 1, 2016, whichever comes first.  He will also need to provide a negative urine sample, “in-competition and out-of-competition, 30, 15, and 3 days before his next contest in Nevada…”

The UFC’s legal counsel on various issues, Campbell and Williams, represented Diaz in negotiating the settlement with the NAC.

Payout Perspective:

It was very interesting that the settlement was passed swiftly and without much talk.  It was not until after did we hear of the terms of the settlement.  You may infer what you may from this outcome.  While Diaz could have made a point by continuing on with a potential lawsuit, we’re not here to spend other people’s money.  Further, if the point is to get him back to fighting, getting tied up in litigation is not in the best interests of Diaz.  On a sidenote, it is interesting in the settlement agreement that it states that Diaz “wrongly invoked the Fifth Amendment” in response to the Commission questions.  We shall see how soon Diaz will be back with the UFC.

Filed Under: Featured, NSAC, regulation, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports