• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Haymon seeks to stay lawsuit filed by Golden Boy

July 8, 2015 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

Attorneys for Al Haymon are seeking to stay the lawsuit filed by Golden Boy Boxing arguing that arbitration in the matter between Haymon and Golden Boy is pending.  Thus, the issues brought up by Golden Boy in its lawsuit may be resolved by the end of July.

The motion seeks to put on hold the lawsuit filed by Golden Boy on May 5th citing Haymon violates portions of the Muhammad Ali Act, antitrust laws and state laws in California.  Haymon’s attorneys state that by July 29, 2015, an Arbitrator will rule on whether all of the claims in the Golden Boy lawsuit have been released pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (“Settlement Agreement”).

Taking a step back, Haymon and Golden Boy entered into the Settlement Agreement which would sever its business relationship.  According to court documents, the Settlement Agreement was signed by the parties (including Richard Schaefer and Oscar De La Hoya) on December 18-19, 2014 and exercised by Haymon on January 8, 2015.  According to Haymon, it was a “global” settlement of all issues between the parties.  Haymon made “a substantial payment to Golden Boy” which Golden Boy accepted when the parties decided to end its business relationship.  The Settlement includes an arbitration provision which would require that the parties be subject to an Arbitrator rather than litigate the matter in court.

According to the motion, a Sports Illustrated article leaked to the press on April 28, 2015 regarding a potential lawsuit to be filed by Golden Boy against Haymon sparked action by the PBC head’s legal team.  Recognizing that the lawsuit might be filed soon, Haymon requested Arbitration under the Settlement Agreement on April 28th.  Attorneys for Golden Boy filed counterclaims against Haymon.  Golden Boy filed suit on May 5th.

The Settlement Agreement includes language preventing a financial audit of Haymon’s records.

Haymon attorneys state that the arbitration was filed before the May lawsuit and the Settlement Agreement includes an arbitration clause stating that the Arbitrator has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the claims have been released.  It cites the Federal Arbitration Act as the reason the court should stay the lawsuit.  The Arbitrator will receive legal briefs on the issue on July 10th and a hearing before the Arbitrator will be held on July 29th.

The actual Settlement Agreement is attached to Al Haymon’s Declaration but it is heavily redacted preventing the public from reading the salacious details of the settlement.

The hearing on the motion to stay will be on August 10th in US District Court in Los Angeles.

Motion to Stay Case – Haymon

Dec of Al Haymon in Support of Motion to Stay

Payout Perspective:

While the court papers state that the Arbitrator will hear the arguments on July 29th, it’s not clear when a decision might be made.  Although Haymon’s legal team will argue that the lawsuit is covered in the Arbitration agreement, it is not known when the Arbitrator would rule.  Thus, aside from substantive legal issues, Golden Boy will argue that this is a stall tactic by Haymon avoiding litigating the lawsuit.

On July 6th, the court transferred the case filed by Top Rank against Al Haymon to the same judge that is handling the Golden Boy case.  Even if the Golden Boy lawsuit is stayed, it still has the Top Rank filing ahead of it.

Filed Under: boxing, Golden Boy

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. d says

    July 8, 2015 at 6:44 am

    Hahaha. Boxing = non stop lawsuits, desperation from banner promotions, a league that is burying everyone, old fans, old fighters. Their all scrambling because they know Mayweather/Pacquaio are done! Hahaha.

    Wait maybe Canelo will be the next Mayweather. Only issue is he sucks.

    Reply
  2. saldathief says

    July 8, 2015 at 8:41 am

    D is a desperate Nancey bahahahah Don’t be hater because boxing is smoking the ufc hahaha

    Reply
  3. d says

    July 8, 2015 at 9:14 am

    Sal likes weeners.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Judge Dismisses Golden Boy’s Lawsuit Against Rival Al Haymon says:
    February 6, 2017 at 12:27 pm

    […] and Golden Boy were set for trial to start on March 17, 2017. Due to a prior Settlement Agreement when the two entities (Haymon Sports and Golden Boy severed its business relationship) the covered […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Live sports is “antidote to churn” boasts Shapiro

Wrestlemania 41 is the highest-grossing event in company history

UFC 314 Payout Perspective

As exclusive negotiating window closes, ESPN bullish on UFC return

UFC makes Meta sponsor deal official

Sports Lawyers Association Broadcast discussing Saudi Arabia involvement in boxing

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

-30-

Twitter 1863292243685372191
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

John Pollock and Brandon Thurston discuss the fallout for Conor McGregor after the conclusion of the civil case

We welcome lawyer Jason Cruz from @MMAPayout to discuss the decision, the fallout for McGregor’s business endeavors, and the UFC’s lack of response.

Twitter 1861864199543992422

Leaving soon

Twitter 1861583105230020701

Coby Bryant

Twitter 1860826101653840296
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Ticket sales information for Keyshawn Davis vs. Gustavo Lemos:
Tickets printed: 9,815
Face value of capacity: $1,069,100
Unsold tickets: 0
Tickets given away: 29
Tickets sold: 9,786
Proceeds from sold tickets: $1,067,450
Adjusted gate for taxes: $1,036,930
Do not believe! Verify.

Twitter 1860124654687728080
Load More

Copyright © 2025 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports