• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Golden Boy, Haymon file motion to dismiss claims in Main Events lawsuit

July 25, 2014 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

Al Haymon and the rest of the defendants sued by promoter Main Events for allegedly breaching a contract for a fight between Adonis Stevenson and Sergey Kovalev have filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit.  However, the Court has allowed Main Events to amend its Complaint which may render the motions moot.

Some background on the lawsuit is here.

Haymon, Showtime Networks, Inc. and Adonis Stevenson filed a motion requesting an oral argument be heard in the motion to dismiss the Complaint.  In general, in federal court, most preliminary motions are decided on the moving papers unless oral argument is requested.  Even then, the Court may deny a request.   In addition, Richard Schaefer filed a motion to dismiss as well under the theory of respondent superior.

Essentially, Haymon et al. argue that there was no valid contract and as a result the Complaint filed against them should be dismissed.  Since there is no contract, the allegations of tortious interference with a contract and interference with economic prospective advantage must be dismissed.  Additionally, defendants claim that it lacked the requisite malice and intent needed for these claims.

The overarching issue is the lack of contract agreement.  The defendants cite an email which preceded the purported email agreement between Stevenson’s promoter and Main Events.  The email indicates that there was an agreement to agree on terms but details needed to be hashed over by attorneys at a later date.  According to the defendants’ brief, in New Jersey, an “agreement to agree” upon material terms at a future time is an unenforceable indefinite promise.

Golden Boy also filed a motion to dismiss the tortious interference with contract and interference with prospective economic advantage claims as well.  Golden Boy joined the motion of the other defendants but argued in addition that it was not responsible for Schaefer’s conduct on the basis of respondeat superior as the allegations occurred after Schaefer’s resignation.  Basically, Golden Boy attempts to absolve itself from any conduct Schaefer may have done while as CEO as it pertains to dealings in the Stevenson-Kovalev deal.

While these Motions to Dismiss were filed, the Court allowed Main Events to submit an Amended Complaint no later than August 4, 2014 (which would make it the Second Amended Complaint).  Discovery is stayed (halted) until further action from the Court

Payout Perspective:

As predicted, defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss citing no formal contract.  While emails between parties may be considered a binding contract, defendants make the argument that the terms were not definite and were only an “agreement to agree.”  However, the news that Main Events may amend its Complaint may mean it will provide further definitive information on its claim.  MMA Payout will keep you posted on the lawsuit.

Filed Under: boxing, contracts, Golden Boy, legal

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. ThisIsTheTruth says

    July 26, 2014 at 11:13 am

    This not credible lawsuit was originally created to keep Sergey Kovalev under Main Events, that’s it; otherwise Kovalev would left her.
    But before he could clearly view the whole picture, she made him sign a long term contract with HBO.
    Let me explane, with this lawsuit against Showtime & Haymon; you already know none of her boxers will have the chance to sign with advisor Al Haymon.

    1) Depriving them of fair financial opportunities.

    As none of them will have the opportunity to won a network deal with Showtime. Because the Kathy Duvas’ legal action, publicly exposed the fact that none of her boxers will make it through Showtime as long they remain with her.

    2) Which is highly considered as an anticompetitive business practices, made by Mrs. Duva.

    *Which are some CLEAR VIOLATIONS of the rules related with the “Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act”.
    Mrs Duva is using the judicial system and the taxpayers money, to plead for a contract which was never signed. It’s like abusing the system for external reasons, like convincing Kovalev to stay under her, or persuade HBO she was not lying when she told them the contract was already sign between Adonis Stevenson & Sergey Kovalev…
    Did she lost her credibility with HBO ?
    – Of course, otherwise HBO would have followed the complaint.

    Reply
  2. Pink Pig says

    July 26, 2014 at 11:41 am

    HBO loses no sleep

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

FBI seeking no-bid contract with the UFC

Court denies Top Rank’s Motion to Dismiss in Keane case

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

UFC 331 attendance, gate and bonuses

Scott Coker is back with Ki MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Dementia characteristic no lie

Orla Joelsen @OJoelsen

What on earth is going on here?

Why is President Trump, spitting on the floor during a rally in North Carolina?

Cubs’ Finances Could Be Unsealed in Rooftop Suit Ahead of CBA Fight via @sportico

First #NBA game of the season and Detroit goes down big only to come back within 5 in the 3rd quarter

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Adam Silver looked at the unemployment rate and said fuck it start the season at 3pm

Boston-San Antonio #NBA Finals

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports