• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa obtains TRO for trademark infringers for UFC 148

July 5, 2012 by Jason Cruz 4 Comments

The Las Vegas Journal Review reports that Zuffa is readying for trademark infringers for UFC 148.  Its lawyers have obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) which will allow the UFC to shut down any vendor it believes infringes on the UFC’s trademark.

The TRO coincides with International Fight Week as many fans are in Vegas for the UFC Fan Expo and 148. It allows the UFC to go after infringers within 10-miles of the MGM Grand (the event venue) and 6 hours before and after the fight. It’s expected that the UFC will have people monitoring vendors to ensure that no one is selling bootleg UFC branded gear.

Payout Perspective:

The article states that this strategy of a pre-emptive strike against potential trademark infringers has not occurred in Vegas since the Oscar de la Hoya-Felix Trinidad fight in 1999.  The strategy is in line with Zuffa’s aggressive protection of its trademark. With the hype for the Silva-Sonnen fight and the UFC Expo, potential infringing vendors are very possible.

Filed Under: legal, piracy, UFC, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    July 6, 2012 at 9:01 am

    I’m confused: is this referring to parties that would attempt to broadcast unauthorized feeds of the event in the Vegas area?

    Reply
  2. robert joyner says

    July 6, 2012 at 11:57 am

    van….. no, this is referring to those that are trying to sell bootleg merchandise in and around las vegas leading up to and just after the Silva-Sonnen fight… from reading the article, it seems they have run into this problem before, but on a smaller scale… guess they had to jump thru some legal hoops in order to be able to really crackdown on the offenders for this show…

    Reply
  3. Light23 says

    July 6, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    That would surely be copyright infringement? My understanding is that this is things like shirts and merchandise, or using the UFC brand to promote/sell anything like an event.

    Reply
  4. Jason Cruz says

    July 6, 2012 at 2:38 pm

    MV,

    Mr. Joyner is correct. Its bootleg shirts, etc. So they will have undercover folks taking down vendors selling illegal stuff. The article did say that the UFC monitors the ‘net in a media room during the event to see if there are illegal sites streaming the PPV.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/11/ufc-freedom-250-kits-revealed/

Unpopular opinion: Kevin Harlan just yells #NBA #Lakers #FOKC

Marcus Smart with a play #Lakers

The guy sold the team to OKC claiming they’d build something in Seattle

Wall Street Journal Opinion @WSJopinion

Seattle turns hostile to the great businesses it made. Starbucks is moving jobs from Washington state to Tennessee, and it isn’t alone in looking elsewhere, writes @HowardSchultz
https://on.wsj.com/4uCiVCD

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

How did Loeffler/360 Promotions rebuild interest in Bohachuk after he lost to Adams the first time?
Why does any promoter, if they still have the rights to the fighter, continue their agreement after a loss?
An attorney and former boxing manager's thoughts (archived):

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports