• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Spike TV re-broadcast draws more viewers than Versus live event

June 28, 2011 by Jason Cruz 2 Comments

MMA Weekly reports that Spike TV’s re-broadcast of UFC Fight Night 22 scored better ratings than UFC on Versus 4. Spike TV scored an average of 793,000 viewers while Versus received 744,000 viewers.

The numbers for this past Sunday’s event on Versus were up from the UFC’s March event on Versus. UFC on Versus 3 received 681,000 viewers. On the other hand, Spike TV ran its marathon of programming culminating with Nate Marquardt battling Rousimar Palhares. Ironically, that fight ended in a little controversy as Palhares claimed Marquardt had grease on his leg to avoid a submission.

Payout Perspective:

It looks like Spike counter-programming worked. While some may not believe Spike’s Sunday schedule was “counter” programming Versus’ fights, the numbers read otherwise. The Nate Marquardt scratch as well as other fight juggling prior to Saturday’s weigh-ins contributed to the lack of star power and interesting matchups. While the card was still entertaining, Spike beat Versus in ratings with a rerun of an event originally airing on Spike. For the casual viewer, the UFC is synonymous with Spike TV. This may be an issue when the UFC looks for a new television home later this year. If the casual viewer were flipping through channels on Sunday and they came across the UFC on Spike, it may stop on that channel without realizing that Versus had the live card.

Filed Under: ratings, TV, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Machiel Van says

    June 29, 2011 at 7:46 am

    Will Spike be able to air old UFC content after the TV deal expires? Or does Zuffa hold all the rights even if the events were broadcast on Spike? And what about TUF reruns? If Spike has some rights to the footage, they could milk the UFC brand for a bit longer.

    If not, however, it won’t matter that Spike TV was synonymous with the UFC if they no longer air any UFC content, people will find it on whatever channel it ends up on, though it might take a little time.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Dana White Talks UFC 132, Nate Marquardt Firing, Spike TV Negotiations & Japan Event says:
    June 30, 2011 at 9:28 pm

    […] because Spike TV’s replay of UFC Fight Night 22, which went head-to-head with UFC on Versus 4, actually beat the live Versus show in the ratings. It was an obvious shot across the bow of the UFC as they’re currently in negotiations with […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

TKO announce Q3 earnings

UFC 333 bonuses

FBI seeking no-bid contract with the UFC

Court denies Top Rank’s Motion to Dismiss in Keane case

Opetaia fires back at IBF in opposition to MTD

UFC 331 Payout Perspective

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Washington announces a home-and-home with Notre Dame, set for 2031 in South Bend and 2034 in Seattle. So mark your calendars.

AEW tops NXT in head-to-head ratings https://mmapayout.com/2026/11/10/aew-tops-nxt-in-head-to-head-ratings/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Sports prediction markets are sports betting disguised as financial trading. They flout state and tribal gambling laws, siphon state tax revenues, fuel addiction, and expose young Americans to public health risks while evading state consumer safeguards.

Congress must ban them.

Aaron Rupar @atrupar

Rubio: "Ultimately our job is to execute on the president's orders ... in the end, the decision is the president's"

Receipts for not going to Saudi

FADE @FadeAwayMedia

Trick Williams pinned Gunther clean after RAW ended tonight in the dark match. 😳

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports