Heavyweight boxer Mahmoud Charr has added defendants to his lawsuit against Don King. The federal court in the Southern District of Florida allowed for Charr to amend his complaint originally filed last August. In the new addition to the lawsuit, Charr adds the World Boxing Association and its president, Gilbert Mendoza, Jr. as conspiring with Don King against the boxer.
Charr claims that he was prevented by King from a mandatory title fight against Trevor Bryan. The fight was delayed twice and the German fighter was stripped of his heavyweight title and his fight pay of $1.5 million pursuant to King winning the purse bid for the fight. The WBA eventually stripped Charr of his WBA “Champion in Recess” title.
Among the claims lodged in the Complaint include violation of the Muhammad Ali Act, Breach of Contract, Tortious Interference with a Business Relationship and CIVIL RICO violations stemming from the alleged multiple violations of civil law.
Delays in the fights taking place included a holdup with Charr receiving a visa to enter the US to fight. This delay caused the WBA to strip Charr of his title and Bermane Stiverne was allowed to take his place.
In its Amended Complaint, Charr claims that the WBA “is generally considered a corrupt organization. This is in large part due to the WBA’s practice of accepting payments and/or gifts from promoters and “fixers” in exchange for fraudulently improving the rankings of fighters.” Charr points the finger at Gliberto Mendoza, Jr. in playing a centrol role in “facilitating the ongoing corrupt practices.”
Notably, in June 2021, King and Bryan filed a lawsuit against the WBA. In the lawsuit, King paints a different picture of the issues with Charr receiving a fight. This included Charr obtaining the wrong visa for his entry into the United States, an allegation that Charr failed a drug test as well as a revolving door of promoters. King alleged in the June 2021 lawsuit that once Charr signed on with a promoter and a bout was agreed upon the fight contract was not signed by Charr.
However, the WBA won a motion to dismiss King and Bryan’s lawsuit against it citing lack of jurisdiction for the lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in New York but the WBA is a Washington state entity with its principal place of business in Panama. Moreover, none of the bouts that King and Bryan mentioned in its lawsuit occurred in New York. The order, filed in June of this year, would seem to moot any issue between King and the WBA but King may still choose to refile the lawsuit in Washington state if he so chose.
Payout Perspective:
The lawsuit reflects the minefield of a path in dealing with promoters and the alphabet soup of boxing. King, vying for his client Bryan, wanted the WBA to make Charr a “Champion in Recess” (name given to boxers that are inactive for one reason or another) which would allow Bryan to jump over the German boxer for a title shot. Champions in recess in the WBA are granted the right to title shots once they return from activity.
Leave a Reply