• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Court in UFC Antitrust Lawsuit decline legal “hot-tub”

December 2, 2018 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Court in the UFC Antitrust lawsuit has ruled that there not be an evidentiary hearing on the admissibility of expert reports and testimony prior to the December 14th Motion for Summary Judgment and Class Certification hearing.

The Court issued a Minute Order late last week:

The Court has considered the Request [ECF No. [617]] for an evidentiary hearing. The Court DENIES this request at this time. The Court will the hear arguments of counsel and make a determination at the hearing on December 14, 2018 whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary to decide the Motion To Certify [ECF No. [518]].

As we explained in this post, the hearing requested by Zuffa was to determine expert testimony and the admissibility of the same.  The Plaintiffs argued that Zuffa was asking for a reconsideration of a evidentiary hearing to determine the expert testimony.  As Plaintiffs point out, the Motion to Certify the Class occurs on December 14th and would require a delay in that decision if they were to entertain such a hearing.

Payout Perspective:

A minor victory for the Plaintiffs here as it does not have to prepare for another hearing in this lawsuit.  It also prevents a determination on the evidence prior to the class certification hearing.  While the Court may still request an evidentiary hearing at some point, it saw no reason to do it prior to next Friday’s big day.  One might take this as good news for Plaintiffs if you think that the Court was concerned about the information that it needed another day to decide the evidence in this case.  Of course, the court’s calendar could be so full, there was just not enough time to slot it in before the 14th.  MMA Payout will keep you posted.

Filed Under: Antitrust Class Action, legal, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Jon jones vs Alex pereira
Connor vs Diaz 3
Illa vs Justin
Sean o vs Peter yan

I would’ve ran the White House card something like that 🤷‍♂️

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

New paramount fans are super happy :/

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Mexico manager Benji Gil calls Monday’s game against USA not only a baseball game, but one of the greatest spectacles in sports with this WBC rivalry. The game is sold out with only standing room only tickets available.

SEATTLESUBMISSIONS @SEATTLESUBMISS

Today is Seattle’s first 7pm sunset of 2026. The dark days are officially over.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 🌇

“What’s the benefit of being tall if you are going to be beat up by a midget anyways”

Happy Punch @HappyPunch

Sean O’Malley went on Matan Even’s show and got cooked 😭

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports