• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Initial UFC 157 PPV buys show impressive debut for women’s MMA

February 26, 2013 by Jason Cruz 24 Comments

MMA Fighting reports  initial indications that Saturday’s UFC 157 PPV buy rate are very strong.   The PPV featuring women for the first time in the UFC is said to have done 40% better than UFC 156 Super Bowl Weekend.

Now all we have to do is to figure out that number.  The LA Times Lance Pugmire tweeted that  UFC 157 was 40% better than UFC 156.

Strong pay per view numbers for UFC due to @rondarousey. I’m told Saturdays fight was 40% better than the Super Bowl card. #UFC157

— Lance Pugmire (@latimespugmire) February 26, 2013

Based on the information, UFC 156 did about 330K PPV buys which means that UFC 157 is a little north of 450K PPV buys.  Bear in mind that the PPV buys for 157 is unofficial but the UFC should be happy with the initial number.

Payout Perspective:

It’s interesting that Pugmire’s tweet came out without providing an actual estimated number.  There is speculation that the buys could be up much more than 450K but we will just have to wait to see.   If the 450K number holds true (or goes up), the UFC is probably happy as well as breathing a sigh of relief. With the amount of promotion it undertook to get coverage for the event, it looks like the media and public relations worked. In my opinion, Rousey, more than women’s MMA, pushed the PPV sales. We will see how this will affect how the UFC will market a women’s match in the future.

Filed Under: pay-per-view, ratings, UFC

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Sampson Simpson says

    February 26, 2013 at 4:31 pm

    Meltzer said 400k which it would have done with Machida-Henderskn as the main event minus any women spectacle

    Reply
  2. Chris says

    February 26, 2013 at 4:56 pm

    Meltzer said 400-450k and if you actually believe that card with Hendo/Machida does 400k you are an idiot.

    considering Reem, Aldo, Edgar, Rashad, Lil Nog, Creepy, JB, Fitch and Maia on a card didnt even hit 400k, Hendo’s last card he headlined did 290k.

    That card without Ronda does 250-300k tops.

    UFC was shooting for 250-300k according to Meltzer so they hit it out of the ballpark with this event and that number.

    Huge success for the UFC, congrats to the UFC, wmma and Ronda the superstar.

    Sampson is pissed.

    Reply
  3. Sampson Simpson says

    February 26, 2013 at 5:04 pm

    Yeah Im SO pissed that some forgettable womens fight generated an extra 100k buys when they tried so hard to sell the garbage. Hahahahaha!!!

    Reply
  4. Chris says

    February 26, 2013 at 5:37 pm

    Simple Sampson is butthurt.

    Why dont we see you in the Bellator 700k viewer articles anymore?

    LOL, UFC is doomed, DOOMED.

    Reply
  5. anti-sampson says

    February 26, 2013 at 5:45 pm

    Hey simple sampson did Ronda smack you?

    Reply
  6. Sampson Simpson says

    February 26, 2013 at 5:50 pm

    You women sure do love womens MMA

    Reply
  7. Brain Smasher says

    February 26, 2013 at 6:25 pm

    Machida was lucky to break 400K as champ verses aother big Draw. Without the Belt vs Hendo was never going to break 400K.

    I also wouldnt trust any numbers released by the LA times guys. The guy has never given any numbers to judge his credibility by. So he claims 40% of something he has no clue of. One thing we do know from Dave is it takes time for the cable companies to get thier shit together and report all their numbers from the many different branches of cable providers. No way this guy knows the numbers yet.

    That said i knew the numbers would be good. To many mainstream media members from ESPN were talking up the fight and saying they were buying the fight. This has a huge effect not to mention the effect of just being on just about every ESPN show to promote the fight. ESPN has always had a huge effect on every UFC PPV marketed on the network. From Tito/Ken, Brock at UFC 100, Rampage/Evans, Chuck/Tito, etc.

    Reply
  8. Chris says

    February 26, 2013 at 8:24 pm

    BS, looking into Machidas past he fought a champ in Rashad when they were both unbeaten, he fought Shogun twice, all those fights were in the UFC PPV peak days. Nobody can deny that MMA has declined in the US the last two years. Then he fought on GSP/Shields card vs Randy and fought the next big star in mma Jon Jones.

    So in this PPV climate with no belt Machida is far from a big time draw.

    That same card with Hendo/Machida in a month with another PPV that card wouldnt do more than 300-325k buys tops. Actually I think that card would probably do 250-275k honestly.

    Reply
  9. Random Dude says

    February 26, 2013 at 9:14 pm

    We need to wait for Dave “the scammer” Meltzer to give us numbers. Then we need to wait another 3-6 months so he can adjust them up or down by 30-40%.

    Reply
  10. Brain Smasher says

    February 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm

    Chris, i think you are saying the same thing as me. I was saying Machida without a belt wouldnt break 400K. I do think he would break 300K though. But i agree with you for the most part.

    Reply
  11. Brain Smasher says

    February 26, 2013 at 9:45 pm

    Random Turd

    He has only “adjusted” a few events in the hundreds he has reported on. You just bring those few events up so tyou can disregard his numbers for 3-6 months and count each even for half of what it really did.

    Reply
  12. Weezy02 says

    February 27, 2013 at 4:09 am

    If correct, that’s the highest PPV buyrate in history for any combat sports athlete at 135 pounds or less. Folks at that weight and below just don’t sell pay-per-views. So this is huge if true. I agree, though, with those that say it’s more a sign of Ronda’s popularity than that of women’s MMA. If she quits tomorrow I don’t think any other female fighter on roster could make huge money for the company.

    Reply
  13. Sampson Simpson says

    February 27, 2013 at 10:45 am

    Weezy = pure ridiculous statement

    Henderson-Machida brought 75 percent of the buys at LEAST

    Reply
  14. Machiel Van says

    February 27, 2013 at 12:42 pm

    This incentive to buy this PPV was the women’s fight. End of story. A sexist attitude doesn’t change that fact.

    Reply
  15. Machiel Van says

    February 27, 2013 at 12:42 pm

    *The incentive

    Reply
  16. Weezy02 says

    February 27, 2013 at 5:06 pm

    “Weezy = pure ridiculous statement”

    You are incorrect, based on what I’ve been able to find so far. What professional boxing eventin history, headlined by fighters 135 pounds or less, had as many PPV buys as Rousey-Carmouche?

    Reply
  17. Weezy02 says

    February 27, 2013 at 5:07 pm

    De La Hoya headlined two PPV events at 135 and didn’t come close to this number. Neither did Chavez-Taylor, etc… Let me know when you find confirmation on one that did.

    Reply
  18. Sampson Simpson says

    February 28, 2013 at 8:41 am

    Rousey pulled in 100k after millions of dollars spent to promoter her. HIlarious really

    Reply
  19. Chris says

    February 28, 2013 at 9:17 am

    Simple Sampson you need to stop dude, your trolling was amusing at first but you are trying way too hard now, it got old and corny real fast.

    If you are a gonna troll atleast do it well.

    Reply
  20. Sampson Simpson says

    February 28, 2013 at 1:40 pm

    Machida-Henderson is worth 300k buys. Rousey pulled in 100k on top of that, not hard to understand idiots

    Reply
  21. Brain Smasher says

    February 28, 2013 at 3:40 pm

    That fight wasnt even promoted much. So you cant say it was responsible for anything. The UFC brad is good for 200K buys and the Hendo fight did little except give people more bang for their buck. So even if you didnt give her credit for the UFC brand she still drew 300K. Now if her fight was so bad and people didnt want to see it. It would have turned off the 200K that the UFC brand pulled in. So apparently they liked the fight too which makes here responsible for that 200K as well.

    Reply
  22. Sampson Simpson says

    February 28, 2013 at 7:55 pm

    Yeah I know… Machida-Henderson is worthless like most UFC matchups. Seriously I agree with you.

    Reply
  23. BrainSmasher says

    March 1, 2013 at 2:07 am

    It doesn’t have the same effect as it would as the Main Event. YOu just claim Rousey was the product of a large marketing push. Well how does the Dan/la Ida fight draw like you say whe. They have no marketing at all? It wasn’t them on the commercials or making rounds at ESPN. So how do you give them the credit? Never mind I know. You are just trolling or a retard one. More than likely both!

    Reply
  24. Sampson Simpson says

    March 1, 2013 at 6:36 am

    yeah you are right. Machida is a nobody and the same with Henderson. Its not like they are real draws like Chavez Jr. or Cotto.

    Boxers have their own drawing power while UFC just owns worthless pawns

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Court moves Ortiz case to arbitration

Dominance responds to Motion to Compel

Pac-May II set for September

Judge hears arguments in Golden Boy TRO request

Golden Boy files Reply Brief in support of TRO

Ortiz files opposition to TRO

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Players can’t even use their highlights for promotional material, but the government can for an illegal and pointless war?

@NFL this ain’t it

Performative art

Championship Rounds @ChampRDS

The moment UFC matchmakers found out about a fight on the White House card falling through 😬

(via @MikeBohn)

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The Stars' attorney just called the Mavericks "the Las Vegas Mavericks."

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The USA Boxing Board of Directors withdraws support of HR 4624 (Ali Revival Act) & an original letter sent on Jan. 18 to the House Committee of Education & Workforce by executive director Mike McAtee, retracting their previous stance on the matter. #Boxing

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

ATTN: #SeaKraken fans…

This is your captain speaking.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports