• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Despite obtaining injunction, Showtime dealt with Periscope users for The Money Fight

August 28, 2017 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

While the Mayweather-McGregor fight trended on twitter this past weekend, so did Periscope as it became a hub of choice for people to watch the fight without paying.  Despite receiving a court order enjoining certain websites from showing the fight, the issue of individuals streaming the event is something that needs enforcement.

Showtime filed a preliminary injunction against a variety of web sites with domain names that essentially advertised that it would show the fight for free.  For example, Livestreamhdq.com, mayweathervsmcgregor.livestreamhdq.com, mcgregorvsmayweather.livestreamhdq.com, Mayweathermcgregorlivefight.us and Mayweathervsmcgregor2017live.us.  The companies with the web sites were sued for alleged copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement and vicarious copyright infringement.  Despite receiving the signed order, it did not prevent individuals from finding individuals from streaming it live on Periscope.

TRO Order by JASONCRUZ206 on Scribd

Payout Perspective:

The move is a sign of the need for intellectual property owners to be more proactive and vigilant in protecting its copyrighted material.  I recent wrote a law review article about the issues related to streaming.  The hard reality is that technology in the form of Facebook Live and Periscope are enabling individuals to take advantage.  While the preliminary injunction focused on the threats that Showtime could find, it cannot police individuals or those that decide to live stream at a moment’s notice.  It’s hard to catch everyone and this is something that will stifle rights holders like the UFC and Showtime in the future.

Filed Under: Boxing vs. MMA, legal, Mayweather-McGregor

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

UFC Freedom 250 kits revealed https://mmapayout.com/2026/05/11/ufc-freedom-250-kits-revealed/

Unpopular opinion: Kevin Harlan just yells #NBA #Lakers #FOKC

Marcus Smart with a play #Lakers

The guy sold the team to OKC claiming they’d build something in Seattle

Wall Street Journal Opinion @WSJopinion

Seattle turns hostile to the great businesses it made. Starbucks is moving jobs from Washington state to Tennessee, and it isn’t alone in looking elsewhere, writes @HowardSchultz
https://on.wsj.com/4uCiVCD

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

How did Loeffler/360 Promotions rebuild interest in Bohachuk after he lost to Adams the first time?
Why does any promoter, if they still have the rights to the fighter, continue their agreement after a loss?
An attorney and former boxing manager's thoughts (archived):

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports