• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

NAC passes settlement agreement with Nick Diaz

January 12, 2016 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Nevada State Athletic Commission passed a proposed settlement agreement with UFC contracted fighter Nick Diaz at the commission’s monthly hearing on Tuesday.

Pat Lundvall, who was the main driver during the contentious Nick Diaz hearing, seconded the motion for the passage of the proposed settlement.  The settlement was passed without any discussion or public announcement as to the terms.  MMA Junkie obtained the settlement agreement after speaking with NSAC Chairman Bob Bennett.

The Settlement Agreement obtained by MMA Junkie indicates that Diaz’s initial penalty was reduced to 18 months (retroactive to his last fight January 31, 2015) and a $100,000 fine.  He will need to pay the fine by August 1, 2016 (the date in which he may be allowed to fight in Nevada) or at least December 1, 2016, whichever comes first.  He will also need to provide a negative urine sample, “in-competition and out-of-competition, 30, 15, and 3 days before his next contest in Nevada…”

The UFC’s legal counsel on various issues, Campbell and Williams, represented Diaz in negotiating the settlement with the NAC.

Payout Perspective:

It was very interesting that the settlement was passed swiftly and without much talk.  It was not until after did we hear of the terms of the settlement.  You may infer what you may from this outcome.  While Diaz could have made a point by continuing on with a potential lawsuit, we’re not here to spend other people’s money.  Further, if the point is to get him back to fighting, getting tied up in litigation is not in the best interests of Diaz.  On a sidenote, it is interesting in the settlement agreement that it states that Diaz “wrongly invoked the Fifth Amendment” in response to the Commission questions.  We shall see how soon Diaz will be back with the UFC.

Filed Under: Featured, NSAC, regulation, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Plaintiffs seeking $270K from Dominance MMA

UFC Seattle attendance, gate and bonuses

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout
Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Every school needs a ballroom.

Get a job my guy

Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸 @AndrewYang

It seems that TKO has really screwed up WWE/Wrestlemania with ads and celebs and getting away from the heart of pro wrestling - and talented performers are paying the price.

lol stay at home

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Sources tell me Vegas picked up Jacob Clark qb Missouri state. Rockwall Tx

He has lost his use of words a shooting doesn’t seem awesome

MMA Junkie @MMAJunkie

Dana White gives account of White House Correspondents' Dinner chaos: 'It was f*cking awesome' https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/story/sports/ufc/2026/04/25/white-house-correspondents-dana-white-reaction-donald-trump-shooter/89804788007/?taid=69ed7c4fe23f1b000178dc0b&utm_campaign=trueAnthem+Manual&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports