• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

NAC passes settlement agreement with Nick Diaz

January 12, 2016 by Jason Cruz Leave a Comment

The Nevada State Athletic Commission passed a proposed settlement agreement with UFC contracted fighter Nick Diaz at the commission’s monthly hearing on Tuesday.

Pat Lundvall, who was the main driver during the contentious Nick Diaz hearing, seconded the motion for the passage of the proposed settlement.  The settlement was passed without any discussion or public announcement as to the terms.  MMA Junkie obtained the settlement agreement after speaking with NSAC Chairman Bob Bennett.

The Settlement Agreement obtained by MMA Junkie indicates that Diaz’s initial penalty was reduced to 18 months (retroactive to his last fight January 31, 2015) and a $100,000 fine.  He will need to pay the fine by August 1, 2016 (the date in which he may be allowed to fight in Nevada) or at least December 1, 2016, whichever comes first.  He will also need to provide a negative urine sample, “in-competition and out-of-competition, 30, 15, and 3 days before his next contest in Nevada…”

The UFC’s legal counsel on various issues, Campbell and Williams, represented Diaz in negotiating the settlement with the NAC.

Payout Perspective:

It was very interesting that the settlement was passed swiftly and without much talk.  It was not until after did we hear of the terms of the settlement.  You may infer what you may from this outcome.  While Diaz could have made a point by continuing on with a potential lawsuit, we’re not here to spend other people’s money.  Further, if the point is to get him back to fighting, getting tied up in litigation is not in the best interests of Diaz.  On a sidenote, it is interesting in the settlement agreement that it states that Diaz “wrongly invoked the Fifth Amendment” in response to the Commission questions.  We shall see how soon Diaz will be back with the UFC.

Filed Under: Featured, NSAC, regulation, UFC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit file statement prior to status conference

Despite two big losses, TKO touts another solid quarter

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026 introduced into Senate with minor changes

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

😂

Jed I. Goodman © @jedigoodman

Dana White on Eddie Hearn: 'I stopped listening to Eddie Hearn about three months ago. Is there anybody more full of shit than this guy?'

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Per GAEC,

Disclosed Purses for all fighters on the #ShieldsScott event

Again, only what was disclosed to the commission:

Claressa Shields: $500,000
Kaye Scott: $54,320

Joseph Hicks: $23,125
Troy Isley: $30,000

Bernice Ferreira: $20,000
Caroline Veyre: $20,300

Roamer Angulo:

UFC 330 Payout Perspective https://mmapayout.com/2026/08/16/ufc-330-payout-perspective/

Shane McMahon theme

Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter

What the Seahawks’ locker room sounded like after Devon Witherspoon became the highest-paid CB in NFL history.

Hard Knocks: Training Camp with the @Seahawks tonight at 9 pm ET on @hbomax.

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Yes, the Pulitzer-winning journalist is the source we should ignore, not the people who continue to want access to the LA sports team they cover. This was a dumb thing to think and an even dumber thing to tweet.

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports