• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

13 for 13: No. 10 Bellator nixes PPV

December 21, 2013 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

November 2nd would have been the date of Bellator’s first PPV which would have featured Rampage Jackson facing Tito Ortiz in the main event.  However, due to an injury to Ortiz, he was a late scratch for the event.  As a result, Bellator cancelled its pay per view and placed the event on Spike TV.

In the end, Bellator 106 on Spike TV pulled 1.1 million viewers with Michael Chandler facing the returning Eddie Alvarez in a 5 round bout.  In the end, the event went over 3 hours and 30 minutes which would have been close to the likely PPV time limit.

The cancellation made the months of promotion between Ortiz and Rampage at Bellator events and on TNA Wrestling shows worthless.  It also showed that Bellator did not believe Chandler-Alvarez II would be a main event that viewers would pay $35-$45 nor did it have a supporting undercard to promote that would support a PPV-worthy show.  What the cancellation inferred was that Bellator was hanging its hopes on PPV buys on Rampage and Tito and hoping that names alone would sell the product.  As we can see, it was a risky play.

Certainly the fact that Bellator attempted to get in front of the story with a decisive move to take it off of PPV and move it to Spike TV provided some damage control.  It could have kept the event on PPV and suffered very low PPV buys.

Will Bellator do a PPV in 2014?  It does not really have to based on its current business model, yet Bjorn Rebney left the PPV option open for an event featuring the Chandler-Alvarez trilogy.

Filed Under: Bellator, Spike, TV

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. assassin says

    December 25, 2013 at 2:04 pm

    I’m behind posting my top 13 for 2013. Bellator is involved in 2 of them, but this isn’t either. Failed PPV on the first time effort, not that big a story. To me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

The UFC’s undying loyalty to Trump

Plaintiffs in Johnson antitrust lawsuit claim White’s devices “wiped” intentionally

Alex Periera accused of sexual assault, coercive sexual encounters, stalking

Court denies request to halt UFC White House event

Plaintiffs file Reply Brief in White House lawsuit

Government response to citizen lawsuit attempting to stop UFC White House

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

If I earned a UFC bonus on Sunday I’d cash out now

Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1

Trump's family crypto business is expected to soon be allowed to operate like a bank — a decision, made by the Trump administration, that would give U.S. companies a new route to steer money to the president.

"For the first time in history, a president is leaning on a bank

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

Lmao! Kiss my ass Hunter Campbell 😜

Absolutely true

Mike is right

MMA Junkie @MMAJunkie

Michael Bisping scolds Pereira for 'crying' about Gane loss: 'Not a good look' https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/story/sports/ufc/2026/06/19/ufc-white-house-michael-bisping-opinion-alex-pereira-reaction-ciryl-gane-loss-bad-look/90618307007/?taid=6a35828bfbb36b00014b16b4&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

The UFC event has destroyed the grass on the Ellipse in front of the White House.

REUTERS/Aaron Schwartz

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports