• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

13 for 13: No. 10 Bellator nixes PPV

December 21, 2013 by Jason Cruz 1 Comment

November 2nd would have been the date of Bellator’s first PPV which would have featured Rampage Jackson facing Tito Ortiz in the main event.  However, due to an injury to Ortiz, he was a late scratch for the event.  As a result, Bellator cancelled its pay per view and placed the event on Spike TV.

In the end, Bellator 106 on Spike TV pulled 1.1 million viewers with Michael Chandler facing the returning Eddie Alvarez in a 5 round bout.  In the end, the event went over 3 hours and 30 minutes which would have been close to the likely PPV time limit.

The cancellation made the months of promotion between Ortiz and Rampage at Bellator events and on TNA Wrestling shows worthless.  It also showed that Bellator did not believe Chandler-Alvarez II would be a main event that viewers would pay $35-$45 nor did it have a supporting undercard to promote that would support a PPV-worthy show.  What the cancellation inferred was that Bellator was hanging its hopes on PPV buys on Rampage and Tito and hoping that names alone would sell the product.  As we can see, it was a risky play.

Certainly the fact that Bellator attempted to get in front of the story with a decisive move to take it off of PPV and move it to Spike TV provided some damage control.  It could have kept the event on PPV and suffered very low PPV buys.

Will Bellator do a PPV in 2014?  It does not really have to based on its current business model, yet Bjorn Rebney left the PPV option open for an event featuring the Chandler-Alvarez trilogy.

Filed Under: Bellator, Spike, TV

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. assassin says

    December 25, 2013 at 2:04 pm

    I’m behind posting my top 13 for 2013. Bellator is involved in 2 of them, but this isn’t either. Failed PPV on the first time effort, not that big a story. To me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Dominance responds to Plaintiffs’ Fee Request

Senate makes mockery of Ali Act hearing

Wrestlemania 42 attendance dips from 2025

How will WWE’s big weekend turn out?

UFC 327 attendance, gate and bonuses

Plaintiffs seeking $270K from Dominance MMA

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

They did this for Khabib in his last fight

hayjive @hayjivepicks

Never seen such blatant corruption at a championship weigh in. Khamzat is one of the last to the scales and it takes all of 3 seconds for commission to shout “185” he doesn’t touch the scale at all, scale doesn’t even settle. Just gives him the weight. Insanity…

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

It is comical the UFC can be the most political sports organization in the history of American sports for clear aims (Ali Act, WH event) while promoting a candidate w/ the most extreme agenda in 50 years and when called to task for that help, pretend they're helpless observers.

Ali Wong's ex-husband got off easier than Russini's current husband.

Now that this Vrabel-Russini thing is full blown, will DC chill tomorrow on the #UFC weigh-in show with Sanko or no

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

the thunder are the dynasty the modern nba deserves (derogatory)

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports